Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun 22;159(4):1262–1275.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.043

Table 3.

Sub-group analyses: Degree of endoscopic healing (MES 0 vs. MES 1) and risk of clinical relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission

Groups Categories No. of studies Relative risk of relapse (95% CI) Heterogeneity within groups (I2) Pinteraction
Publication type Full text 13 0.51
(0.37–0.70)
59 0.45
Abstract 4 0.40
(0.22–0.70)
75
Study design Prospective 5 0.55
(0.35–0.84)
45 0.53
Retrospective 12 0.46
(0.33–0.64)
68
Study location Western 8 0.50
(0.38–0.67)
17 0.85
Asia 9 0.48
(0.31–0.73)
76
Medication* 5-ASA only 4 0.33
(0.16–0.69)
63 0.20
Others 12 0.55
(0.42–0.74)
57
Endoscopic reading Central 4 0.34
(0.16–0.73)
80 0.29
Local 13 0.53
(0.40–0.69)
51
Follow-up period 12 months 9 0.60
(0.44–0.83)
44 0.10
> 12 months 8 0.39
(0.26–0.58)
69
Risk of bias in
outcome measurement
Moderate 9 0.62
(0.51–0.76)
20 0.005
High 8 0.31
(0.20–0.48)
48
*

Type of medication used to induce and maintain initial clinical remission; data extraction was not available in one study.CI: Confidence intervals