Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;11:537766. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.537766

TABLE 5.

Genome-wide association study for 12 phosphorus use efficiency traits studied using two models: the general linear model with Q structure (GLM + Q) and the mixed linear model with Q structure and kinship (MLM).

Condition Traita GLM + Q
MLM
R2c
No. of SNPs sharedd
Sigb Average Range Sigb Average Range Average (%) Range (%)
log10(p)
log10(p)
Optimum P PRL 64 4.52 4.00–6.75 3 4.40 4.12–4.84 13.74 10.77–19.77 3
TRL 34 4.89 4.01–7.62 4 4.53 4.23–5.34 14.84 12.27–22.02 4
TSA 82 4.75 4.01–6.90 7 4.61 4.12–5.16 14.48 12.29–20.18 7
TRV 94 4.76 4.01–7.18 9 4.60 4.00–5.48 14.52 12.27–20.91 9
RAD 39 4.49 4.01–5.81 0 13.64 12.28–17.28 0
TRT 43 4.46 4.00–6.11 13 4.39 4.04–5.45 13.93 12.25–19.18 13
RF 84 4.74 4.02–7.51 6 4.32 4.07–5.02 14.36 12.30–21.76 6
CHL 18 4.36 4.03–5.09 0 13.28 12.34–15.34 0
TLA 56 4.67 4.02–8.97 10 4.80 4.02–6.29 14.48 10.37–25.4 10
RDW 15 5.45 4.05–7.34 10 5.34 4.06–5.99 17.25 12.39–21.32 10
SDW 61 4.73 4.01–7.50 6 4.91 4.48–5.30 14.54 12.28–21.72 6
RSR 7 4.80 4.06–6.66 1 5.48 5.48–5.48 14.45 12.42–17.29 1
Low P PRL 30 4.57 4.03–5.65 1 4.29 4.29–4.29 13.88 12.35–16.86 1
TRL 35 4.39 4.00–5.39 0 13.34 12.25–16.16 0
TSA 45 4.38 4.01–5.52 0 13.31 12.26–16.49 0
TRV 18 4.38 4.01–5.62 0 13.33 12.26–16.77 0
RAD 8 4.22 4.02–4.43 0 12.88 12.31–13.47 0
TRT 11 4.46 4.01–6.29 2 4.53 4.12–4.95 13.42 10.60–20.53 2
RF 28 4.46 4.02–6.44 7 4.23 4.01–4.93 13.62 12.31–18.98 7
CHL 18 4.59 4.03–5.72 4 4.44 4.18–4.92 14.16 12.35–17.04 1
TLA 53 4.42 4.01–5.77 5 4.26 4.03–4.90 13.39 10.33–17.16 5
RDW 17 4.65 4.17–5.45 10 4.47 4.10–5.11 14.59 12.74–17.84 10
SDW 50 4.53 4.00–6.82 2 4.42 4.41–4.43 13.54 10.55–19.96 2
RSR 4 4.46 4.23–4.88 1 4.59 4.59–4.59 13.58 11.22–15.86 1
Ratio PRL 55 4.49 4.01–5.88 0 13.45 11.55–17.46 0
TRL 3 4.36 4.01–4.70 2 4.13 4.07–4.20 13.21 12.09–14.43 2
TSA 0 0 0
TRV 0 0 0
RAD 13 4.36 4.06–5.18 2 4.32 4.17–4.46 13.49 12.42–15.57 2
TRT 11 4.57 4.00–5.90 6 4.35 4.10–5.24 14.27 12.25–18.42 6
RF 4 4.26 4.12–4.45 2 4.33 4.25–4.41 12.06 10.76–12.90 2
CHL 4 4.57 4.52–4.74 1 4.65 4.65–4.65 14.33 13.72–16.18 1
TLA 72 4.96 4.00–7.90 18 4.43 4.03–5.85 15.02 12.26–22.75 18
RDW 27 4.63 4.02–6.62 5 4.39 4.24–4.88 14.24 12.29–19.46 5
SDW 6 4.26 4.08–5.01 1 4.01 4.01–4.01 13.10 12.48–15.11 1
RSR 62 4.65 4.02–7.28 1 4.43 4.43–4.43 14.09 12.32–21.15 1

PRL, primary root length; TRL, total root length; TSA, total root surface area; TRV, total root volume; RAD, root average diameter; TRT, total root tips; RF, root forks; CHL, chlorophyll concentration; TLA, total leaf area; RDW, root dry weight; SDW, shoot dry weight; RSR, root-to-shoot ratio. aThe traits tested in the study. bThe total number of significant SNPs detected at the threshold of −log(p) = 4.0. cThe phenotypic variation revealed by ANOVA with total significant SNPs detected using the two models. dThe number of significant SNPs detected by both models.