Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;18(11):e06297. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6297

Table 4.

Potential novel aspects of gene drive modified insects compared to genetically modified insects (GMIs) that do not contain an engineered gene drive and other disease vector/pest control strategies that involve the release of non‐GMIs (in the scope of this GMO Panel Scientific Opinion)

Potential novel aspects Comparators
GMIs that do not contain an engineered gene drive (primarily RIDL, fsRIDL)a Natural gene drives and Wolbachia‐mediated pathogen interference (PI) Sterile insect technique (SIT) Wolbachia‐mediated incompatible insect technique (IIT) Classical biological control (CBC)
Preferential inheritance [of a transgenic construct] No Yes [No] No No No
Intended spatial and temporal scale of spread of the genetic modification(s) of interest Spatially temporally restricted Spatially temporally unrestricted (case‐specific) Spatially temporally restricted Spatially temporally restricted Spatially temporally unrestricted (case specific)
Scale of population suppression Local (at present) NA Local and area‐wide Local (at present) Case specific
Population modification strategies [involving transgenes] No [No] Yes [No] NA NA NA
Target non‐domesticated or wild species in non‐managed environments Yes (case specific) Yes (case specific) Yes (case specific) Yes (case specific) Yes (case specific)
Spatio‐temporal controllability Yes No (case specific) Yes Yes No (case specific)

fsRIDL: release of insects carrying a dominant female lethal transgene; RIDL: release of insects carrying a dominant lethal transgene.

a

GMIs contributing to the direct enhancement of production systems through enhanced stress tolerance, performance or fitness characteristics are not covered.