Table 4:
Comparison of RFV and nRFVa
| Parameters | CF Group (n = 11) | NF Group (n = 16) | P Valueb |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFV4 (mm3) | 553.4 ± 616.5 (128.4–2264.0) | 358.9 ± 358.5 (0–1307.0) | .42 |
| RFV6 (mm3) | 526.3 ± 552.9 (123.5–2036.0) | 331.8 ± 338.0 (0–1230.0) | .31 |
| RFV8 (mm3) | 495.8 ± 486.9 (118.6–1800.0) | 262.5 ± 290.1 (0–1070.0) | .18 |
| RFV10 (mm3) | 454.9 ± 406.1 (111.0–1519.0) | 210.8 ± 259.9 (0–913.2) | .10 |
| RFV12 (mm3) | 399.5 ± 304.1 (103.6–1174.0) | 175.2 ± 229.6 (0–753.6) | .05 |
| RFV14 (mm3) | 329.7 ± 201.5 (93.9–833.0) | 140.1 ± 196.3 (0–586.2) | .02 |
| RFV16 (mm3) | 250.6 ± 119.5 (82.7–463.3) | 110.2 ± 159.8 (0–526.4) | .02 |
| RFV18 (mm3) | 181.5 ± 99.2 (67.7–406.4) | 84.4 ± 124.6 (0–432.3) | .03 |
| RFV20 (mm3) | 142.9 ± 106.7 (27.7–382.3) | 58.3 ± 85.8 (0–292.0) | .04 |
| nRFV4 | 0.97 ± 0.02 (0.90–0.99) | 0.84 ± 0.27 (0–0.99) | .07 |
| nRFV6 | 0.95 ± 0.05 (0.81–0.98) | 0.77 ± 0.29 (0–0.97) | .02 |
| nRFV8 | 0.92 ± 0.07 (0.72–0.97) | 0.64 ± 0.33 (0–0.96) | .004 |
| nRFV10 | 0.88 ± 0.10 (0.61–0.96) | 0.54 ± 0.37 (0–0.95) | .002 |
| nRFV12 | 0.82 ± 0.14 (0.47–0.94) | 0.46 ± 0.37 (0–0.93) | .001 |
| nRFV14 | 0.74 ± 0.20 (0.33–0.92) | 0.37 ± 0.34 (0–0.90) | .001 |
| nRFV16 | 0.64 ± 0.26 (0.19–0.90) | 0.29 ± 0.31 (0–0.85) | .004 |
| nRFV18 | 0.53 ± 0.30 (0.07–0.87) | 0.24 ± 0.28 (0–0.79) | .02 |
| nRFV20 | 0.43 ± 0.31 (0.03–0.82) | 0.17 ± 0.23 (0–0.71) | .03 |
Note:—RFV4, RFV6, RFV8, RFV10, RFV12, RFV14, RFV16, RFV18, and RFV20 indicate intra-aneurysmal RFV with an average flow velocity of >4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 cm/s, respectively; and nRFV4, nRFV6, nRFV8, nRFV10, nRFV12, nRFV14, nRFV16, nRFV18, and nRFV20 indicate intra-aneurysmal nRFV with an average flow velocity of >4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 cm/s, respectively.
a
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (range).
b
P values were estimated using the Welch t test between CF and NF groups.