Table 4:
Reference | Year of Publication | No. of Patients | No. of Patients with OPSCC | HPV Status Available | High ADC Associated with |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kim et al15 | 2009 | 33 | 22 | N | Poor outcome |
Hatakenaka et al16 | 2011 | 57 | 22 | N | Poor outcome |
Ohnishi et al17 | 2011 | 64 | 30 | N | Poor outcome |
Srinivasan et al18 | 2012 | 20 | 11 | N | Poor outcome |
Nakajo et al19 | 2012 | 26 | 8 | N | Better outcome |
King et al20 | 2013 | 37 | 14 | N | Poor outcome |
Chawla et al21 | 2013 | 32 | 9 | N | Poor outcome |
Lambrecht et al22 | 2014 | 161 | 85 | N | Poor outcome |
Ng et al23 | 2016 | 69 | 37 | N | Poor outcome |
Noij et al24 | 2015 | 78 | 40 | N | Poor outcome |
Preda et al25 | 2016 | 57 | 11 | Na | Poor outcome |
Marzi et al26 | 2017 | 34 | 14 | N/Yb | Poor outcome |
Lombardi et al27 | 2017 | 47 | 19 | N | Poor outcome |
Martens et al28 | 2019 | 134 | 96 | Y | Poor outcomec |
Note:—N indicates no; Y, yes.
Minimum ADC value within the ROI.
Only for the small cohort of patients with OPSCC.
Maximum ADC value within the ROI.