Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;5(44):28606–28614. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03565

Table 1. Photophysical and Computational Data.

  λabsa (nm) λema (nm) Φflb (%) EHOMOc (eV) ELUMOc (eV) Egapd (eV) ETDDFTe (eV) Egap(opt)f (eV)
Cz–Cz 341 490 42 –5.39 –1.88 3.51 3.10 3.53
Cz–BMes 329 485 36 –5.35 –1.85 3.50 3.12 3.45
Cz–Npa 400 579 29 –5.27 –2.48 2.79 2.54 2.90
Cz–NpaBr 434 573 24 –5.30 –2.68 2.62 2.37 2.68
Pz–Pz 356 N/A N/A –5.01 –1.92 3.09 2.71 3.33
Pz–BMes 327 485 32 –4.95 –1.86 3.09 2.73 3.45
Pz–Npa 444 581 26 –4.87 –2.50 2.37 2.11 2.65
Pz–NpaBr 489 625 22 –4.90 –2.70 2.20 1.95 2.44
a

Recorded in CH2Cl2 (c = 1.0 × 10–5 M) for the longest λmax.

b

Fluorescence quantum efficiency (Φfl).

c

Obtained by DFT calculations (B3LYP, 6-31G*).

d

HOMO–LUMO energy gap: Egap = ELUMOEHOMO.

e

Vertical excitation of the lowest transition (S0 → S1) calculated by TD-DFT (B3LYP, 6-31G**).

f

Calculated from the experimental absorption onset.