Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 22;103(4):791–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02225.x

Table 3.

Analysis of factors that may affect the survival of patients with KRAS wild‐type colorectal carcinoma (n = 112)

Characteristics P (univariate) P (multivariate) HR
Age (years)
<50 vs ≥50 0.48 NA NA
Gender
Male vs female 0.36 NA NA
Performance status
0 vs 1, 2 0.21 NA NA
Primary tumor
Colon vs rectum 0.45 NA NA
VEGF expression level
≥10% vs <10% positive cells 0.02 0.06 1.68
At least one tumor ≥6 cm
Presence vs absence 0.15 NA NA
Histologic differentiation
Good–moderate vs poor 0.13 NA NA
Lymphovascular invasion
Presence vs absence 0.06 NA NA
Metastasis at diagnosis
Yes vs No 0.03 <0.01 3.82
Serum CEA level (ng/mL)
≤6 vs >6 0.34 NA NA
Second‐line chemotherapy
No vs yes 0.03 0.02 2.32
EGFR R521K polymorphism
G/G (wild‐type) vs G/A or A/A 0.03 0.02 2.41
ERCC1 codon 118 genotype
C/T or T/T vs C/C 0.01 <0.01 4.51
XPD codon 751 status
Lys/Gln vs Lys/Lys 0.02 <0.01 3.35
TSER 28‐bp polymorphism
2R/2R+2R/3R vs 3R/3R 0.18 NA NA

bp, base pair; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERCC1, excision repair cross‐complementing group 1; HR, Cox hazard ratio; NA, not analyzed; TSER, 5′‐enhancer region of the thymidylate synthase gene; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; XPD, xeroderma pigmentosum group D.