Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 30;103(11):2007–2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02387.x

Table 2.

The odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of processed food consumption in modelsa

Cases n (%) Controls n (%) P‐valueb Crude odds ratio Model 1 Model 2 Final model
Intake frequency of preserved vegetable
 <1 time/week 89 (35.2) 147 (58.1) <0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 ≤3 time/week 72 (28.5) 80 (31.6) 1.68 (1.05, 2.68) 1.64 (0.93, 2.89) 1.78 (1.02, 3.09) 1.10 (0.55, 2.23)
 >3 time/week 92 (36.4) 26 (10.3) 5.17 (3.05, 8.74) 5.58 (2.95, 10.57) 4.54 (2.49, 8.28) 5.01 (2.07, 12.17)
 P for trend <0.01
Intake frequency of pickled vegetable
 <1 time/week 55 (21.7) 55 (21.7) >0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 <1 time/day 29 (11.5) 33 (13.0) 0.84 (0.45, 1.59) 0.86 (0.40, 1.88) 0.95 (0.44, 2.04) 1.18 (0.41, 3.43)
 ≥1 time/day 169 (66.8) 164 (65.2) 1.03 (0.67, 1.57) 1.07 (0.62, 1.85) 1.03 (0.62, 1.71) 0.66 (0.30, 1.43)
 P for trend >0.05
Intake frequency of salted meat
 <1 time/month 46 (18.2) 66 (26.2) <0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
 <1 time/week 81 (32.0) 105 (41.7) 1.11 (0.68, 1.80) 1.02 (0.55, 1.92) 1.31 (0.71, 2.43) 1.79 (0.74, 4.33)
 ≥1 time/week 126 (49.8) 81 (32.1) 2.21 (1.36, 3.61) 2.25 (1.21, 4.18) 2.85 (1.54, 5.27) 2.57 (1.02, 6.43)
 P for trend >0.05
a

Age, smoking and alcohol drinking are adjusted in model 1; total consumption of fruits and vegetables are adjusted in model 2; and in the final model, the other two processed foods, age, smoking, alcohol drinking, fruit and vegetable consumption, family esophageal cancer history and annual per capita income are adjusted.

b

Cochran–Armitage trend test.