Pilot Studies and RCTs |
Bystad, et al.; 2016. |
Probable AD with increased level of certainty by NINCDS-ADRDA; MMSE > 18 |
25 |
tDCS; awake |
1:1 Treatment:Sham |
No |
Treatment group age=70.0±8.0; Sham group age=75.0±8.7 |
L temporal lobe; 10–20 system |
Anode = T3 |
Cathode = Fp2 |
35 |
None |
2 mA |
30 |
6 sessions; 10 days |
Verbal Memory |
CVLT-II |
MMSE, TMT A, TMT B, clock-drawing test |
No significant differences in CVLT-II, MMSE, TMT A, TMT B, or clock drawing test were seen between the treatment and sham group. |
Yun, et al,; 2016. |
MCI diagnosis by Peterson criteria |
16 |
tDCS; awake |
1:1 Treatment:Sham |
No |
Treatment group Age = 74.8±7.5; Sham group Age = 73.1±4.2 |
Bilateral DLPFC; 10–20 system |
Anode = F3 |
Cathode = F4 |
25 |
None |
2 mA |
30 |
6 sessions; 10 days |
Subjective Memory Complaint Scale from Participants, FDG-PET |
MMQ |
n/a |
The treatment group showed improvement in subjective memory scores on the MMQ-A (ability) and MMQ-C (contentment) subscores compared to sham. |
Ladenbauer; et al.; 2017. |
Amnestic MCI (single or multidomain) by Mayo criteria, with objective cognitive decline with scores < 1 SD below norms on memory tests; MMSE >=24 |
16 |
Slow oscillatory tDCS; delivered during a daytime nap |
Balanced crossover design, each participant received 1 treatment and 1 sham session, at least 2 weeks apart |
No |
Age=71±9 |
Bifrontal stimulation, using anodal current with sinusoidal oscillations at a frequency of 0.75 Hz; 10–20 system |
F3 |
F4 |
8 mm diameter |
Bilateral Mastoids; 0.64 |
0.522 mA/cm2 |
15–25 (5 minute blocks of stimulation given during stage 2,3, or 4 NREM sleep, for a total of 3–5 blocks) |
1 session; 1 day |
Visual recognition memory, EEG |
Visuospatial Memory Task comprised on neutral pictures taken from the International Affective Picture System |
Procedural fingertapping task, verbal memory task, location memory task |
There was an improvement in visual recognition memory in the treatment group compared to sham when controlling for sleepiness. There was no effect of treatment on procedural memory, verbal memory, or location memory. |
Murugaraja, et al.; 2017 |
MCI diagnosis by NIA-AA criteria, CDR=0.5 |
11 |
tDCS; awake |
None |
No |
Age=59.6 |
L DLPFC; 10–20 system |
Anode = F3-FP1 |
Cathode = R supra-orbital region |
35 |
None |
2 mA |
20 |
5 sessions; 5 days |
Visual Memory |
PMIT |
n/a |
Improved immediate and delayed recall on the PMIT immediately after conclusion of the treatment. Improvement on delayed recall PMIT persisted 1 month later |
Cruz Gonzalez, et al.; 2018 |
MCI diagnosis by modified Peterson’s criteria, MOCA 19–26, CDR <=0.5 |
5 |
tDCS; awake |
A-B-C-A protocol; anodal tDCS + CS, sham tDCS + CS, and CS only |
Yes |
Age=72.8±6.6 |
L DLPFC; 10–20 system |
Anode = L DLPFC |
n/a |
35 |
R deltoid; 35 |
2 mA |
30 |
1–5 sessions total of active tDCS + cognitive stimulation |
Not Specified |
Not specified |
Performance on Cognitive Stimulation tasks from Neuron Up, MOCA, Digit Span, TMT |
There was an improvement on the Neuron Up task in three subjects who received three or more tDCS sessions |
Manenti, et al.; 2017. |
Amnestic MCI by Petersen criteria, MMSE 24–30, CDR=0.5 |
18 |
tDCS; awake |
1:1 Treatment:Sham |
Yes |
Treatment group Age=75.3±4.8; Sham group Age=75.3±2.2 |
L lateral prefrontal cortex; 10–20 system |
Anode = F3 |
Cathode = Fp2 |
35 |
n/a |
1.5 mA |
15 |
Day 1 = Initial Learning Session only, Day 2 = Memory Reactivation + active tDCS or Sham Session, Day 3 and Day 30 = Retrieval Session only |
Verbal Memory |
Experimental Memory Task (Learning, Reactivation, Free Recall, and Recognition) |
n/a |
Active tDCS treatment enhanced Memory Recognition scores compared to Sham. |
Case Reports and Clinical Case Series |
Andrade, et al.; 2016. |
AD diagnosis by NINCDSADRDA criteria, CDR = 1 |
1 |
tDCS; awake |
None |
No |
Age=73 |
L DLPFC; 10–20 system |
Anode = F3 |
Cathode = R supraorbital region |
35 |
n/a |
2 mA |
30 |
10 sessions; 2 weeks |
Global Cognition |
ADAS-Cog |
NPI, BDS, DAD |
After treatment, ADAS-Cog, NPI, BDS, and DAD showed improvement compared to baseline |
Bystad, et al.; 2016. |
Early AD diagnosis, criteria not specified |
1 |
tDCS; awake |
None |
No |
Age=59 |
L temporal lobe; 10–20 system |
Anode = T3 |
Cathode = FP2 |
not specified |
n/a |
2 mA |
30 |
12 sessions; 6 days |
Verbal Memory |
CVLT-II, EEG |
MMSE, TMT A, D-KEFS Word Fluency, WMS Attention Span, Clock-drawing test |
After treatment, the CVLT-II and MMSE showed improvement compared to baseline. |
Bystad, et al.; 2017. |
Early-onset AD, Dubois criteria. |
1 |
tDCS; awake, applied at home with help from family |
None |
No |
Age=60 |
L temporal lobe; 10–20 system |
Anode = T3 |
Cathode = FP2 |
not specified |
n/a |
2 mA |
30 |
daily for 8 months |
Memory, Visuospatial, Language, and Attention |
RBANS |
|
Overall the patient’s cognitive function remained stable over 8 months, with improvement in memory (immediate and delayed recall), and decline in visuospatial function. |
Costa, et al.; 2017. |
Possible AD diagnosis by NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, MMSE = 14.27 |
1 |
tDCS; awake |
1 week of Sham was followed by treatment intervention |
Yes |
Age=67 |
R angular and supramarginal gyrus; 10–20 system |
Anode = P6-CP6 |
Cathode = L supraorbital region |
35 |
n/a |
2 mA |
30 |
5 sessions; 1 week |
Language |
BADA |
|
After treatment there was a significant improvement in comprehension of verbs, compared to sham. This persisted for 2 weeks post-stimulation. |
Gramegna, et al.; 2018. |
Posterior cortical atrophy with AD diagnosis via CSF tau and a-beta |
1 |
tDCS; awake |
None |
Cognitive rehab therapy preformed prior to initiation of tDCS |
Age=58 |
L DLPFC; 10–20 system |
Anode = F3 |
n/a |
not specified |
R shoulder |
2 mA |
20 |
20 sessions; 4 weeks; repeated for 2 separate cycles, total of 40 tDCS sessions |
Executive function, fMRI |
Stroop task while in the fMRI scanner |
Complete NPS evaluation |
The patient showed improvement on the Stroop task after cognitive training, which was maintained after the first and second tDCS cycle. |
Mukku, et al.; 2018. |
1 patient with an AD diagnosis, 1 patient with a LBD diagnosis |
2 |
High Definition tDCS; awake |
None |
No |
AD patient Age =; LBD patient Age=68 |
10–10 system |
High Definition tDCS used five ring electrodes arranged on the scalp around the central Cathode |
Cathode = CP5 |
ring electrode with outer radius 12 mm, inner radius 6 mm |
n/a |
2 mA |
20 |
2 sessions per day, 10–20 sessions total; 5–10 days of treatment |
Auditory Hallucinations |
AHRS |
|
Both the AD and LBD patient showed decrease frequency of auditory hallucinations on the AHRS and decreased acting out behavior. |