Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Neurol. 2019 Apr;32(2):292–304. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000669

Table 2: Studies investigating tES as a therapeutic tool in ADRD.

Studies investigating tES for treatment of ADRD using clinical or biomarker diagnostic criteria. Age is shown as Mean±SD. LBD = Lewy body dementia. CVLT = California Verbal Learning Test; TMT = Trail Making Test; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; MMQ = Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire; PMIT = Picture Memory Impairment Test; MOCA = Montreal Cognitive Assessment; ADAS-Cog = Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive; BDS = Blessed Dementia Scale; DAD = Disability Assessment for Dementia; D-KEFS = Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System; WMS = Wechsler Memory Scale; RBANS = Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status; BADA = Battery for the Analysis of the Aphasic Deficit; AHRS = Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale.

Electrical Stimulation Studies 2016–2018 Criteria for AD/MCI and disease stage No. of Participants Type of Stimulation Sham/Control Interleaved Cognitive Stimulation Age Target area; localization method Scalp Electrode 1 Scalp Electrode 2 Scalp Electrode size (cm2) Extracranial Electrode and size (cm2) Current Duration (min) Total Number of Sessions; Length of Intervention Cognitive Domain Neuropsychological Tests – Primary Outcome Neuropsychological Tests – Secondary Outcomes Main Significant Neuropsychological Findings
  Pilot Studies and RCTs
Bystad, et al.; 2016. Probable AD with increased level of certainty by NINCDS-ADRDA; MMSE > 18 25 tDCS; awake 1:1 Treatment:Sham No Treatment group age=70.0±8.0; Sham group age=75.0±8.7 L temporal lobe; 10–20 system Anode = T3 Cathode = Fp2 35 None 2 mA 30 6 sessions; 10 days Verbal Memory CVLT-II MMSE, TMT A, TMT B, clock-drawing test No significant differences in CVLT-II, MMSE, TMT A, TMT B, or clock drawing test were seen between the treatment and sham group.
Yun, et al,; 2016. MCI diagnosis by Peterson criteria 16 tDCS; awake 1:1 Treatment:Sham No Treatment group Age = 74.8±7.5; Sham group Age = 73.1±4.2 Bilateral DLPFC; 10–20 system Anode = F3 Cathode = F4 25 None 2 mA 30 6 sessions; 10 days Subjective Memory Complaint Scale from Participants, FDG-PET MMQ n/a The treatment group showed improvement in subjective memory scores on the MMQ-A (ability) and MMQ-C (contentment) subscores compared to sham.
Ladenbauer; et al.; 2017. Amnestic MCI (single or multidomain) by Mayo criteria, with objective cognitive decline with scores < 1 SD below norms on memory tests; MMSE >=24 16 Slow oscillatory tDCS; delivered during a daytime nap Balanced crossover design, each participant received 1 treatment and 1 sham session, at least 2 weeks apart No Age=71±9 Bifrontal stimulation, using anodal current with sinusoidal oscillations at a frequency of 0.75 Hz; 10–20 system F3 F4 8 mm diameter Bilateral Mastoids; 0.64 0.522 mA/cm2 15–25 (5 minute blocks of stimulation given during stage 2,3, or 4 NREM sleep, for a total of 3–5 blocks) 1 session; 1 day Visual recognition memory, EEG Visuospatial Memory Task comprised on neutral pictures taken from the International Affective Picture System Procedural fingertapping task, verbal memory task, location memory task There was an improvement in visual recognition memory in the treatment group compared to sham when controlling for sleepiness. There was no effect of treatment on procedural memory, verbal memory, or location memory.
Murugaraja, et al.; 2017 MCI diagnosis by NIA-AA criteria, CDR=0.5 11 tDCS; awake None No Age=59.6 L DLPFC; 10–20 system Anode = F3-FP1 Cathode = R supra-orbital region 35 None 2 mA 20 5 sessions; 5 days Visual Memory PMIT n/a Improved immediate and delayed recall on the PMIT immediately after conclusion of the treatment. Improvement on delayed recall PMIT persisted 1 month later
Cruz Gonzalez, et al.; 2018 MCI diagnosis by modified Peterson’s criteria, MOCA 19–26, CDR <=0.5 5 tDCS; awake A-B-C-A protocol; anodal tDCS + CS, sham tDCS + CS, and CS only Yes Age=72.8±6.6 L DLPFC; 10–20 system Anode = L DLPFC n/a 35 R deltoid; 35 2 mA 30 1–5 sessions total of active tDCS + cognitive stimulation Not Specified Not specified Performance on Cognitive Stimulation tasks from Neuron Up, MOCA, Digit Span, TMT There was an improvement on the Neuron Up task in three subjects who received three or more tDCS sessions
Manenti, et al.; 2017. Amnestic MCI by Petersen criteria, MMSE 24–30, CDR=0.5 18 tDCS; awake 1:1 Treatment:Sham Yes Treatment group Age=75.3±4.8; Sham group Age=75.3±2.2 L lateral prefrontal cortex; 10–20 system Anode = F3 Cathode = Fp2 35 n/a 1.5 mA 15 Day 1 = Initial Learning Session only, Day 2 = Memory Reactivation + active tDCS or Sham Session, Day 3 and Day 30 = Retrieval Session only Verbal Memory Experimental Memory Task (Learning, Reactivation, Free Recall, and Recognition) n/a Active tDCS treatment enhanced Memory Recognition scores compared to Sham.
  Case Reports and Clinical Case Series
Andrade, et al.; 2016. AD diagnosis by NINCDSADRDA criteria, CDR = 1 1 tDCS; awake None No Age=73 L DLPFC; 10–20 system Anode = F3 Cathode = R supraorbital region 35 n/a 2 mA 30 10 sessions; 2 weeks Global Cognition ADAS-Cog NPI, BDS, DAD After treatment, ADAS-Cog, NPI, BDS, and DAD showed improvement compared to baseline
Bystad, et al.; 2016. Early AD diagnosis, criteria not specified 1 tDCS; awake None No Age=59 L temporal lobe; 10–20 system Anode = T3 Cathode = FP2 not specified n/a 2 mA 30 12 sessions; 6 days Verbal Memory CVLT-II, EEG MMSE, TMT A, D-KEFS Word Fluency, WMS Attention Span, Clock-drawing test After treatment, the CVLT-II and MMSE showed improvement compared to baseline.
Bystad, et al.; 2017. Early-onset AD, Dubois criteria. 1 tDCS; awake, applied at home with help from family None No Age=60 L temporal lobe; 10–20 system Anode = T3 Cathode = FP2 not specified n/a 2 mA 30 daily for 8 months Memory, Visuospatial, Language, and Attention RBANS Overall the patient’s cognitive function remained stable over 8 months, with improvement in memory (immediate and delayed recall), and decline in visuospatial function.
Costa, et al.; 2017. Possible AD diagnosis by NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, MMSE = 14.27 1 tDCS; awake 1 week of Sham was followed by treatment intervention Yes Age=67 R angular and supramarginal gyrus; 10–20 system Anode = P6-CP6 Cathode = L supraorbital region 35 n/a 2 mA 30 5 sessions; 1 week Language BADA After treatment there was a significant improvement in comprehension of verbs, compared to sham. This persisted for 2 weeks post-stimulation.
Gramegna, et al.; 2018. Posterior cortical atrophy with AD diagnosis via CSF tau and a-beta 1 tDCS; awake None Cognitive rehab therapy preformed prior to initiation of tDCS Age=58 L DLPFC; 10–20 system Anode = F3 n/a not specified R shoulder 2 mA 20 20 sessions; 4 weeks; repeated for 2 separate cycles, total of 40 tDCS sessions Executive function, fMRI Stroop task while in the fMRI scanner Complete NPS evaluation The patient showed improvement on the Stroop task after cognitive training, which was maintained after the first and second tDCS cycle.
Mukku, et al.; 2018. 1 patient with an AD diagnosis, 1 patient with a LBD diagnosis 2 High Definition tDCS; awake None No AD patient Age =; LBD patient Age=68 10–10 system High Definition tDCS used five ring electrodes arranged on the scalp around the central Cathode Cathode = CP5 ring electrode with outer radius 12 mm, inner radius 6 mm n/a 2 mA 20 2 sessions per day, 10–20 sessions total; 5–10 days of treatment Auditory Hallucinations AHRS Both the AD and LBD patient showed decrease frequency of auditory hallucinations on the AHRS and decreased acting out behavior.