Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0236774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236774

Table 2. BLAST results using full length ITS sequences compared to ITS sequences trimmed to the GenBank reference panel alignment (618 bp) used in phylogenetic analysis.

Full Length Trimmed to Alignment Length
Sample Name Presumed Species1 Genbank Accession Sequence Length (bp) Top BLAST Hit2 GenBank Query Coverage GenBank Percent Similarity Top BLAST Hit2 GenBank Query Coverage GenBank Percent Similarity
Powder #1 G. lucidum MT994154 824 G. lucidum (MF476200.1) 100% 100% G. lingzhi (MH160076.1) 100% 100%
Powder #2 G. lucidum MT994155 739 G. lucidum (MF476201.1) 99% 99% G. lingzhi (MH160076.1) 99% 99%
Powder #3 G. lucidum MT994156 868 G. lucidum (MF476200.1) 100% 100% G. lingzhi (MH160076.1) 100% 100%
Powder #4 G. lucidum MT994157 868 G. lucidum (MF476200.1) 100% 100% G. lingzhi (MH160076.1) 100% 100%
Powder #5 G. lucidum MT994158 865 G. lucidum (MF476200.1) 100% 100% G. lingzhi (MH160076.1) 100% 100%
Powder #6 G. lucidum MT994159 844 G. lucidum (MF476200.1) 100% 99% G. lingzhi (MH160076.1) 100% 100%
Fresh #1 G. brownii MT994160 848 G. australe (MK968731.1) 100% 97% G. brownii (MG279159.1) 100% 100%
Fresh #2 Fomitopsis pinicola MT994161 780 F. pinicola (EF530947.1) 100% 99% F. pinicola (EF530947.1) 100% 99%
Fresh #3 G. lucidum MT994162 868 G. lucidum (MF476200.1) 100% 99% G. lingzhi (MH160076.1) 100% 100%

1Presumed species is based on product label for store-bought samples and morphological identification [49] for wild-collected samples.

2All top BLAST hits had an E-value of 0.0.