Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;9(14):e013973. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013973

Table 3.

Clinical Outcome

Variable ViTAVR (N=25) ViSAVR (N=74) P Value (Overall) N
Day 1 ejection fraction, % 60.0 (50.0–65.0) 60.0 (47.0–65.0) 0.631 96
Day 1 PVL > mild 1.000 97
No 25 (100) 70 (97.2)
Yes 0 (0.00) 2 (2.78)
Day 1 ViV mean gradient, mm Hg 15.0 (11.8–17.5) 16.0 (11.0–21.0) 0.370 95
Day 1 ViV peak gradient, mm Hg 26.5 (19.8–36.2) 29.0 (20.5–38.0) 0.249 95
Postprocedural gradient category 0.572 95
Normal 19 (79.2) 52 (73.2)
20–24 mm Hg 4 (16.7) 9 (12.7)
25–29 mm Hg 1 (4.17) 4 (5.63)
>29 mm Hg 0 (0.00) 6 (8.45)
Hospital stay, d 9.00 (4.00–16.0) 3.00 (2.00–6.00) <0.001 93
Death (hospital) 1.000 99
No 24 (96.0) 70 (94.6)
Yes 1 (4.00) 4 (5.41)
New permanent pacemaker implantation or major arrhythmia 0.011 78
No 13 (68.4) 55 (93.2)
Yes 6 (31.6) 4 (6.78)
Day 30 ejection fraction, % 59.0 (51.0–65.5) 61.0 (54.0–66.0) 0.810 67
Day 30 PVL > mild 1.000 69
No 16 (100) 51 (96.2)
Yes 0 (0.00) 2 (3.77)
Day 30 ViV mean gradient, mm Hg 12.5 (8.75–16.2) 16.4 (13.0–20.2) 0.043 68
Day 30 ViV peak gradient, mm Hg 24.0 (17.2–29.8) 29.5 (23.8–36.0) 0.059 66
Postprocedural gradient at 30 d, mm Hg 0.201 68
<20  14 (87.5) 35 (67.3)
>19  2 (12.5) 17 (32.7)

Values are shown as median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and number (percentage) for categorical variables. Group differences are presented as overall P value. PVL indicates paravalvular leakage; ViSAVR, valve in surgical aortic valve replacement; ViTAVR, valve in transcatheter aortic valve replacement; and ViV, valve‐in‐valve.