Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;9(14):e015361. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015361

Table 1.

General Characteristics of 117 Included Trials in the Study (n=117)

No. (%)
Extent of loss to follow‐up (overall)
 <1% 34 (38)
 1% to ≤2.5% 19 (21)
 2.5 to ≤5% 14 (15)
 5% to ≤7.5% 9 (10)
 7.5% to ≤10% 3 (3)
 >10% 12 (13)
Cardiology subspecialty
 Electrophysiology 22 (19)
 Heart failure 3 (3)
 Interventional cardiology 33 (28)
 Open heart surgery 4 (3)
 General cardiologya 51 (44)
 Cardiovascular imaging 4 (3)
Control
 Standard care 18 (15)
 Placebo 31 (27)
 Pharmacological 28 (24)
 Surgical/interventional 36 (31)
 Other 4 (3)
Funding
 Private for profit 58 (50)
 Private not for profit 21 (18)
 Governmental 24 (20)
 Not reported 13 (11)
 Not funded 1 (1)
Reporting of methods to deal with LTFU
 Reported in methods 100 (86)
 Reported in results 1 (1)
 No 16 (14)
Among the trials that LTFU occurred (n=91)b
 Separately reported in 2 arms 70 (77)
 Compared the LTFU group baseline characteristics with not LTFU 0 (0)
 Implication of LTFU discussed 6 (7)
Analytical method to handle LTFU
 No LTFU occurred 26 (22)
 Complete case analysisc 10 (8)
 Worst‐case scenario 2 (2)
 Multiple imputation 2 (2)
 Inverse probability weighting 0 (0)
 Censored at time of LTFU in time‐to‐event analysis 75 (64)
 Assumption that none of the LTFU participants have event 2 (2)
CONSORT diagram
 Without the diagram 32 (27)

CONSORT indicates Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; LTFU, loss to follow‐up.

a

General cardiology trials in this review referred to pharmacological trials and lifestyle‐changing trials.

b

Number shown refers to trials that did the following.

c

Complete case analysis is defined as an analysis that only include patients with complete outcome data. LTFU patients are excluded from the whole analysis.