Table 1.
No. (%) | |
---|---|
Extent of loss to follow‐up (overall) | |
<1% | 34 (38) |
1% to ≤2.5% | 19 (21) |
2.5 to ≤5% | 14 (15) |
5% to ≤7.5% | 9 (10) |
7.5% to ≤10% | 3 (3) |
>10% | 12 (13) |
Cardiology subspecialty | |
Electrophysiology | 22 (19) |
Heart failure | 3 (3) |
Interventional cardiology | 33 (28) |
Open heart surgery | 4 (3) |
General cardiologya | 51 (44) |
Cardiovascular imaging | 4 (3) |
Control | |
Standard care | 18 (15) |
Placebo | 31 (27) |
Pharmacological | 28 (24) |
Surgical/interventional | 36 (31) |
Other | 4 (3) |
Funding | |
Private for profit | 58 (50) |
Private not for profit | 21 (18) |
Governmental | 24 (20) |
Not reported | 13 (11) |
Not funded | 1 (1) |
Reporting of methods to deal with LTFU | |
Reported in methods | 100 (86) |
Reported in results | 1 (1) |
No | 16 (14) |
Among the trials that LTFU occurred (n=91)b | |
Separately reported in 2 arms | 70 (77) |
Compared the LTFU group baseline characteristics with not LTFU | 0 (0) |
Implication of LTFU discussed | 6 (7) |
Analytical method to handle LTFU | |
No LTFU occurred | 26 (22) |
Complete case analysisc | 10 (8) |
Worst‐case scenario | 2 (2) |
Multiple imputation | 2 (2) |
Inverse probability weighting | 0 (0) |
Censored at time of LTFU in time‐to‐event analysis | 75 (64) |
Assumption that none of the LTFU participants have event | 2 (2) |
CONSORT diagram | |
Without the diagram | 32 (27) |
CONSORT indicates Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; LTFU, loss to follow‐up.
General cardiology trials in this review referred to pharmacological trials and lifestyle‐changing trials.
Number shown refers to trials that did the following.
Complete case analysis is defined as an analysis that only include patients with complete outcome data. LTFU patients are excluded from the whole analysis.