Table 1.
Device | Study | Study Design (Key Inclusion Criteria) | No. | Author | Year Published | Time Frame | Main Efficacy Findings* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corvia Atrial Shunt | Feasibility | Single arm (EF >45%, NYHA class II–IV, PCWP >15 mm Hg at rest or >25 mm Hg during exercise) | 11 | Søndergaard et al 32 | 2014 | 1 mo | PCWP at rest† ↓5 mm Hg |
Malek et al 33 | 2015 | 12 mo | NYHA class ↓0.5; MLWHF ↓29; 6MWT ↑32 m | ||||
REDUCE LAP‐HF 34 |
Single arm (EF >40%, NYHA II–IV, PCWP >15 mm Hg at rest or >25 mm Hg during exercise) |
64 | Hasenfuß et al 35 | 2016 | 6 mo |
Qp:Qs 1.27 Peak exercise PCWP/W per kg 15 mm Hg/W per kg |
|
Kaye et al 36 | 2016 | 12 mo | NYHA median by 1 class; 6MWT ↑32 m; MLWHF questionnaire ↓15; patency confirmed in 98.5% | ||||
Kaye et al 40 | 2018 | 36 mo | Observed mortality was 3.4/100 pt‐y; lower than 10.2/100 pt‐y predicted by baseline MAGGIC score (P=0.02) | ||||
REDUCE LAP‐HF I mechanistic study 38 | Randomized, sham‐controlled, double‐blinded (NYHA III/IV, EF ≥40%, exercise PCWP ≥15 mm Hg) | 44 | Feldman et al 37 | 2018 | 1 mo |
PCWP at peak exercise † ↓3 mm Hg Peak exercise PCWP/W per kg 16 mm Hg/W per kg |
|
Shah et al 39 | 2018 | 12 mo | Yearly HFH rate ↓67% (P=0.06); NYHA median by 1 class; 6MWT no difference; KCCQ no difference. 100% shunt patency | ||||
V‐Wave Gen1 | Special access pilot (Canada) | Single arm (NYHA III/IV, EF ≤40%, PCWP ≥15 mm Hg) | 10 | Del Trigo et al 47 | 2016 | 3 mo | N=8/9 showed improved NYHA; Duke activity status 11; KCCQ 35; 6MWT 74 m; PCWP ↓6 mm Hg |
Pilot | Single arm (NYHA III/IV; EF >15%; ≥1 HFHs within 1 y) | 38 | Rodes‐Cabau et al 48 | 2018 | 12 mo | NYHA class I or II in 62%; KCCQ 73% improved ≥5‐point improvement; 6MWT ↑28 m; no significant change in PCWP, RAP, or PAP; Qp:Qs 1.1; 14% of valves occluded and 36% stenotic by 12 mo; better hemodynamic responses in patients with patent shunt | |
V‐Wave Gen2 |
Pilot | Single arm (NYHA III or IV) | 6 | Guimaraes et al 49 | 2020 | 12 mo | NYHA class I or II in 83%; Duke activity status ↑15; KCCQ ↑32; 6MWT ↑64 m; Qp:Qs 1.16. |
Occlutech AFR | AFR‐PRELIEVE | Single arm (NYHA III or IV; EF ≥15%) | 36 | Paitazoglou et al 51 | 2019 | 3 mo | In HFrEF/HFpEF: NYHA class ‐1.4/‐1.1; KCCQ ↑16/↑20; 6MWT 30/↑26 m; PCWP ↓2/↓5 mm Hg; Qp:Qs 1.3/1.1 |
NoYa | Pilot | Single arm (EF >35%) | 10 | Lotan 53 | 2019 | 1–3 mo | Shunt diameter 3‐4 mm; 6MWT 56 m; BNP 1878 pg/mL |
6MWT indicates 6‐minute walk test; AFR, atrial flow regulator; BNP, B‐type natriuretic peptide; EF, ejection fraction; HFH, heart failure hospitalization; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; IASD, interatrial shunt device; KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; MAGGIC, Meta‐Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure; MLWHF, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PAP, pulmonary artery pressure; PCWP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; PRELIEVE, Pilot Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Atrial Flow Regulator (AFR) in Heart Failure Patients; REDUCE LAP‐HF, Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure; Qp:Qs, ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flow; RAP, right atrial pressure; and W, watts.
For single‐arm studies, values are changes relative to patients’ baseline values; for randomized studies, changes are relative to the control group.
Indicates primary end point when one was declared prospectively.