Skip to main content
. 2020 May 8;9(10):e015772. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.015772

Table 5.

Univariable Cox Regression Analyses: the Effects of Traditional Risk Factors and CAD Characteristics on the Decrease of △CT‐FFR at Follow‐Up CCTA

Univariate
Unadjusted HR [95% CI] P Value
Age (per+1 y) 1.00 [0.98–1.02] 0.94
Men 0.94 [0.61–1.46] 0.79
Diabetes mellitus 0.71 [0.43–1.17] 0.18
Dyslipidemia 0.89 [0.54–1.47] 0.65
Hypertension 1.09 [0.71–1.68] 0.70
Current smoker 1.56 [0.94–2.61] 0.09
Family history of CAD 1.01 [0.72–1.88] 0.81
LAP(+) at baseline 1.49 [0.91–2.44] 0.12
SC(+) at baseline 0.76 [0.33–1.75] 0.52
RI at baseline 0.73 [0.25–2.15] 0.57
NRS(+) at baseline 1.17 [0.76–1.82] 0.49
DS at baseline 2.47 [0.56–10.93] 0.23
Agatston calcium score at baseline 1.00 [0.99–1.01] 0.92
TPV at baseline 1.00 [0.99–1.01] 0.98
Calcified PV at baseline 1.00 [0.99–1.01] 0.81
Non‐calcified PV at baseline 1.00 [0.99–1.01] 0.78
△CT‐FFR at baseline 16.33 [0.64–41.35] 0.09
Plaque type
Calcified Reference ···
Noncalcified 2.02 [1.12–3.65] 0.021
Mixed 1.45 [0.77–2.73] 0.25

CAD indicates coronary artery disease; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; CT, computed tomography; DS, diameter stenosis; FFR, fractional flow reserve; HR, hazard ratio; LAP, low attenuation plaque; NRS, napkin‐ring sign; PV, plaque volume; RI, remodeling index; SC, spotty calcification; and TPV, total plaque volume.