Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sch Psychol. 2020 Sep 2;82:17–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.07.004

Table 2.

Fit Indices for Models Examining Teacher-Student Warmth and Conflict Trajectories in Grade 1 to 12

Model LogL AIC BIC SABIC Entropy LMR-LRT p
Warmth
2-Class −6850.72 13737.44 13821.31 13764.15 0.71 579.86 < .001
3-Class −6800.56 13645.12 13747.63 13677.77 0.70 96.69 0.10
4-Class −6778.28 13608.56 13729.70 13647.13 0.69 42.96 0.22
5-Class −6759.81 13579.62 13719.40 13624.13 0.61 35.60 0.33
6-Class −6751.86 13571.71 13730.13 13622.16 0.58 15.33 0.56
Conflict
2-Class −6532.31 13100.62 13184.49 13127.33 0.89 1443.30 < .001
3-Class −6394.94 12833.87 12936.37 12866.51 0.85 264.81 0.15
4-Class −6325.13 12702.25 12823.39 12740.83 0.84 134.57 0.27
5-Class −6273.25 12606.50 12746.28 12651.01 0.83 100.00 0.29
6-Class −6226.08 12520.17 12678.58 12570.62 0.82 90.92 0.28

Note. LogL = Loglikelihood, AIC = Akaike information criteria, BIC = Bayesian information criteria, SABIC = Sample-size adjusted Bayesian information criteria; LMR-LRT = Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test. G = grade. Class solutions highlighted in bold were selected as the optimal model for each set of analyses.