Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sch Psychol. 2020 Sep 2;82:17–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.07.004

Table 4.

Estimates for Conditional Growth Models Examining Children’s Conduct Problems by Teacher-student Warmth Trajectory Class

Conduct problems (parent reports) Conduct problems (teacher reports)
Effects Est SE p Est SE p
Grade 1
Moderate warmth 1.26 0.28 *** 2.33 0.27 ***
High early-declining warmth 0.69 0.18 *** 1.39 0.17 ***
Low-increasing warmth 1.64 0.34 *** 4.97 0.33 ***
Grade 6
Moderate warmth 0.26 0.24 0.35 0.21
High early-declining warmth 0.87 0.17 *** 2.03 0.17 ***
Low-increasing warmth 1.54 0.39 *** 3.10 0.44 ***
Grade 12
Moderate warmth 0.36 0.27 0.25 0.26
High early-declining warmth 0.85 0.24 *** 0.52 0.22 *
Low-increasing warmth 1.39 0.49 ** 0.98 0.49 ***
G1-G5 slope
Moderate warmth −1.99 0.54 *** −3.97 0.58 ***
High early-declining warmth 0.36 0.38 1.27 0.45 **
Low-increasing warmth −0.21 0.87 −3.75 1.05 ***
G6-G12 slope
Moderate warmth 0.16 0.43 −0.16 0.48
High early-declining warmth −0.03 0.40 −2.52 0.46 ***
Low-increasing warmth −0.24 0.84 −3.54 1.15 **

Notes: G = grade. The high-declining warmth trajectory class was used as the reference group. These models also included effects for gender, ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, early academic performance, and grade retention, however these estimates are not reported in the table to simplify the presentation of results.

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001