Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sch Psychol. 2020 Sep 2;82:17–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.07.004

Table 5.

Estimates for Conditional Growth Models Examining Children’s Conduct Problems by Teacher-student Conflict Trajectory Class

Conduct problems (parent reports) Conduct problems (teacher reports)
Effects Est SE p Est SE p
Grade 1
High late-declining conflict 1.90 0.40 *** 4.34 0.35 ***
Moderate conflict 0.53 0.22 * 0.88 0.19 ***
Adolescent-onset conflict 0.30 0.29 0.50 0.30
High early-declining conflict 1.22 0.25 *** 4.22 0.25 ***
Grade 6
High late-declining conflict 2.14 0.38 *** 5.05 0.34 ***
Moderate conflict 0.88 0.21 *** 2.64 0.17 ***
Adolescent-onset conflict 0.29 0.32 0.47 0.28
High early-declining conflict 0.81 0.26 ** 1.44 0.22 ***
Grade 12
High late-declining conflict 1.58 0.45 *** 1.69 0.46 ***
Moderate conflict 1.19 0.32 *** 0.60 0.26 *
Adolescent-onset conflict −0.07 0.37 2.13 0.49 ***
High early-declining conflict 0.53 0.25 * 1.01 0.32 **
G1-G5 slope
High late-declining conflict 0.48 0.91 1.44 1.04
Moderate conflict 0.70 0.49 3.51 0.50 ***
Adolescent-onset conflict −0.01 0.70 −0.05 0.89
High early-declining conflict −0.81 0.56 −5.55 0.58 ***
G6-G12 slope
High late-declining conflict −0.94 0.80 −5.61 1.04 ***
Moderate conflict 0.51 0.57 −3.40 0.56 ***
Adolescent-onset conflict −0.61 0.75 2.76 0.92 **
High early-declining conflict −0.47 0.42 −0.73 0.64

Notes: G = grade. The low conflict trajectory class was used as the reference group. These models also included effects for gender, ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, early academic performance, and grade retention, however these estimates are not reported in the table to simplify the presentation of results.

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001