Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;22(10):e19685. doi: 10.2196/19685

Table 3.

Comparison of Allied Health referrals using negative binomial regression. Patients matched for age, sex, and treatment status.



Univariate Multivariable


RRa Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P value RRa Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P value
Group

Intervention 0.44 0.27 0.72 <.001 0.74 0.48 1.16 .20

Control Reference Reference
Stage <.001


<.001

0/I Reference Reference

II 2.73 1.62 4.61 <.001 2.16 1.30 3.60 .003

III 7.29 4.14 12.86 <.001 6.10 3.52 10.56 <.001

IV 10.61 5.96 18.89 <.001 9.62 5.51 16.79 <.001

Missing 17.00 8.86 32.62 <.001 9.69 5.20 18.03 <.001
Socioeconomic status (IRSD)b <.001


.14

1 3.61 1.79 7.29 <.001 2.22 1.15 4.31 .02

2 2.26 1.11 4.58 .02 2.34 1.18 4.62 .01

3 1.12 0.51 2.42 .78 1.59 0.75 3.41 .23

4 Reference Reference

5 1.85 0.88 3.87 .10 2.12 1.05 4.27 .04
Recruitment site


<.001


<.001

1 1.92 0.89 4.16 .10 2.58 1.23 5.41 .01

2 0.14 0.05 0.36 <.001 0.21 0.08 0.54 .001

3 3.52 1.63 7.57 .001 3.38 1.60 7.16 .001

4 Reference


Reference


Waiting time 0.9992 0.9990 0.9994 <.001 0.9993 0.9991 0.9995 <.001

aRR: Relative risk.

bIRSD: Index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage. 1=most disadvantaged; 5=least disadvantaged.