Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 19;24(12):1293–1299. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02308-4

Table 1.

Patient and lesion characteristics and outcomes of treatment

Patient characteristics
Age, mean (SD), years 62.3 (14.5)
Sex, male/female, n (%) 6 (66.7)/3 (33.3)
ASA grade I/II, n (%) 3 (33.3)/6 (66.7)
Lesion characteristics
 Location: rectum/ sigmoid colon, n (%) 5 (55.6)/4 (44.4)
 Treatment-naïve lesion, n (%) 6 (66.7)
 Pretreated lesion (previous EMR), n (%) 3 (33.3)
 Paris classification: 0–Is/0–IIa/0–IIa + Is/0–IIa + IIc, n (%) 0/3 (33.3)/5 (55.6)/1 (11.1)
 JNET classification: type 2A/Type 2B, n (%) 7 (77.8)/2 (22.2)
 Surface pattern: granular/non granular/granular mixed 0/3 (33.3)/6 (66.7)
 SMSA scoring system: median (range) 14 (12—16)
 Lesion size: mean (SD), cm2 64.02 (31.2)
 Histology: LGIEN/HGIEN, n (%) 5 (55.6)/4 (44.4)
Outcomes of treatment
 Successful rate of DEA-ESD, n (%) 9 (100.0)
 Procedure time: mean (SD), minutes 128.4 (54.1)
 Resection speed: mean (SD), minutes/cm2 2.26 (1.06)
 Resection: En bloc/piecemeal, n (%) 9 (100.0)/0 (0.0)
 R0 resection: R0/R1–Rx, n (%) 9 (100.0)/0 (0.0)
 Complications (CTCAE grade)a, n (%) 0 (0.0)
 Recurrence at 3 months after index ESD, n (%) 0 (0.0)

SD standard deviation, ASA American Association of Anesthesiologists, EMR endoscopic mucosal resection, JNET Japan NBI Expert Team, LGIEN low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, HGIEN high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, SMSA size, morphology, site, and access score, ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection

aIncluding delayed bleeding, perforation, stenosis, and pain CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (version 4.0)