Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 24;12(4):809–822. doi: 10.1007/s12403-019-00339-3

Table 4.

Bland and Altman statistics for sanitary risk observations made by four observers, relative to the ‘gold standard’ Observer A (JOO) (***Indicates significance at alpha = 0.001)

Versus Observer B Versus Observer C Versus Observer D Versus Observer E Versus Observer F
No. of water source visits 139 146 53 147 152
Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (95% confidence intervals) 0.320 (0.22–0.42) 0.515 (0.40–0.63) 0.372 (0.20–0.55) 0.435 (0.33–0.54) 0.230 (0.15–0.31)
Pearson’s r 0.496 0.553 0.504 0.570 0.441
Bias correction factor 0.645 0.931 0.738 0.764 0.521
Average difference in % risk scores (95% limits of agreement) 15.4% (− 14.0% to 44.8%) 5.2% (− 24.4 to 34.8) 12.9% (− 20.5% to 46.4%) 11.9% (− 18.2% to 42.1%) 21.7% (− 15.0% to 58.5%)
Correlation between difference in risk scores and mean − 0.14 − 0.22 − 0.32 − 0.29 − 0.39
Bradley-Blackwood F test 75.5 (***) 12.9 (***) 19.4 (***) 54.4 (***) 132.8 (***)