Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 19;375(1813):20200064. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0064

Table 1.

Number of effect sizes, studies and the mean (range) sample size of species analysed in the (a) testes and (b) sperm meta-analyses. The total dataset is summarized separately for each meta-analysis followed by a summary that illustrates the distribution of data based on phylum (Arthropoda versus Chordata) and class/subclass of animals included in the analyses.

meta-analysis effect sizes studies mean n (range)
(a) testes meta-analysis 99 58a 35.3 (2–776)
phylum class/subclass
 Arthropoda Arachnida 1 1 8
Insecta 7 5 14.6 (2–28)
 Chordata Actinopterygii 15 7 27.5 (2–111)
Amphibia 6 5 40.8 (24–65)
Aves 24 17 61.2 (2–776)
Chondrichthyes 2 1 12
Mammalia 44 23 28 (2–141)
(b) sperm meta-analysis 186 74 42.3 (2–323)
phylum class/subclass
 Arthropoda Arachnida 2 1 8
Insecta 23 19 21.6 (2–127)
 Chordata Actinopterygii 9 5 19.3 (7–46)
Amphibia 16 4 56.2 (22–130)
Aves 54 18 48.2 (3–232)
Chondrichthyes 4 1 16.5 (16–18)
Mammalia 74 29 47.5 (2–226)
Reptilia 4 1 25

aNote that the total number of studies is one less than the sum of the number of studies when divided by phylum and class/subclass as one study presented data from two animal classes.