Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;10:19622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76164-5

Table 2.

Estimated range reduction and expansion based on differences between presD-CL and pastD-CL evaluated based on six thresholds. presD-CL is estimated present distribution using present climate and land cover data, and pastD-CL is estimated past distributions using past climate and land cover data. Mean of the area (M) and the percentage of difference (Δ) were calculated using 10 replicates. The area is the number of presence cells (1 km2) in pastD-CL.

B. diversus B. ardens B. hypocrita B. ignitus B. honshuensis B. beaticola
Minimum training presence (MTP)
M 353,035.6 353,290.4 363,308.4 268,256.1 154,213.4 82,626.7
Δ − 0.0118% 1.54% − 2.02% − 2.08% − 13.0% − 32.2%
10 percentile training presence (10PTP)
M 214,795.7 155,386.5 184,868.7 108,410.9 36,888.6 22,279.7
Δ − 9.57% 9.41% − 21.0% − 25.5% − 21.5% − 49.6%
Equal training sensitivity and specificity (ETSS)
M 99,943.7 83,415 85,002.4 77,324 27,838.5 30,292.8
Δ − 13.8% 20.9% − 35.4% − 29.4% − 19.8% − 50.2%
Maximum training sensitivity plus specificity (MTSS)
M 95,652.7 98,874.2 62,476.8 90,583.2 28,373.4 36,623.1
Δ − 13.9% 17.3% − 30.7% − 27.6% − 19.7% − 48.8%
Balance training omission, predicted area and threshold value (BTPT)
M 347,251.4 280,877.9 267,114.4 186,582.1 149,940.7 88,380.8
Δ − 0.425% 3.49% − 12.7% − 14.9% − 13.4% − 29.7%
Equate entropy of thresholded and original distribution (EETO)
M 232,786.7 166,065.7 168,237 111,922.9 52,770.1 35,245
Δ − 8.45% 8.72% − 23.8% − 24.9% − 24.1% − 49.5%