Table 6.

Whole sample results.

	Path	t	p	Lo95	Hi95	f2	VIF
Direct effect
Benefit➔positive perception	0.550	19.012	0.000	0.493	0.607	0.434	1.000
	R2 = 0.302
Benefit➔negative perception	0.221	5.493	0.000	0.151	0.303	0.051	1.000
	R2 = 0.048
Positive perception➔threatened perception	0.226	5.113	0.000	0.145	0.312	0.043	1.497
Negative perception➔threatened perception	0.204	5.343	0.000	0.139	0.288	0.048	1.098
Benefit➔threatened perception	0.179	3.981	0.000	0.095	0.269	0.028	1.443
	R2 = 0.210
Benefit➔attitude toward PSBB policy	0.109	3.471	0.001	0.047	0.170	0.017	1.484
Threatened perception➔attitude toward PSBB policy	0.124	3.224	0.001	0.046	0.191	0.026	1.270
Positive perception➔attitude toward PSBB policy	0.497	12.464	0.000	0.414	0.576	0.336	1.562
Negative perception➔attitude toward PSBB policy	0.219	4.888	0.000	0.137	0.316	0.089	1.150
	R2 = 0.529, Q2 = 0.527
Indirect effect						VAF
Benefit➔perception +➔threatened perception	0.170	5.787	0.000	0.118	0.233	20.8	na
Benefit➔perception +➔threatened perception attitude toward PSBB policy	0.365	12.712	0.000	0.311	0.424	15.3	na
Perception positive➔threatened perception➔attitude toward PSBB policy	0.028	2.585	0.010	0.008	0.048	7.6	na
Perception negative➔threatened perception➔attitude toward PSBB policy	0.025	2.474	0.013	0.008	0.044	5.2	na

ns, not significant. Significance, t statistics, and 95% confidence can be corrected. A bootstrap procedure performs the interval with 10,000 replications. VIF, Inflation of model variants in factors; VAF, variance recorded.