Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;222(12):2012–2020. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa316

Table 4.

Optimization Model Performance of Top Predictors of Composite End-Stage Liver Disease

Top Predictor Metabolites AUC Sensitivity, % Specificity, % Positive Likelihood Ratio Negative Likelihood Ratio
SM(37:1), PC(32:0), LPC(16:0) 0.84 63 83 3.9 0.43
LPC(15:0), PC(32:0), Cer(41:1) 0.84 55 85 3.78 0.52
LPC(15:0), SM(37:1), PC(32:0) 0.84 65 88 5.71 0.39
TCA, PC(32:0), LPC(16:0) 0.84 68 80 3.5 0.39
PC(32:0), LPC-O(16:1), DG(39:0) 0.84 65 83 4 0.41
LPC(20:4), PC(32:0), Val 0.84 62 90 6.33 0.42
LPC(15:0), PC(32:0), Cer(43:1) 0.84 63 83 3.9 0.43
LPC(15:0), PC(32:0), DG(39:0) 0.84 68 81 3.82 0.38
LPC(15:0), PC(32:0), SM(39:1) 0.84 59 83 3.6 0.49
LPC(15:0), TCA, Val 0.84 68 83 4.2 0.37

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; Cer, ceramide; DG, diacylglycerol; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; SM, sphingomyelin; TCA, taurocholic acid.