TABLE 2.

Two-way mixed-model ANOVA of gaitline length symmetry across training phases (BSL, late baseline; EA, early adaptation; MA, mid-adaptation; LA, late adaptation; EPA, early postadaptation), with the between-subject factor group (HC vs. PwMS) and the within factor day (T0, T1, T2).

Source	Correction	Df	F	p	${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\text{p}}^2$
Within-group effects BSL	GG
Day (T0, T1, T2)		1.451	0.046	0.909	0.003
Day × group		1.451	1.548	0.231	0.079
Error day		26.123
Between-group effects BSL
Group		1	0.297	0.593	0.016
Error group		18
Within-group effects EA	GG
Day (T0, T1, T2)		1.316	0.238	0.696	0.015
Day × group		1.316	0.677	0.459	0.041
Error day		32
Between-group effects EA
Group		1	0.139	0.714	0.009
Error group		16
Within-group effects MA
Day (T0, T1, T2)		2	0.019	0.981	0.001
Day × group		2	0.392	0.679	0.001
Error day		30
Between-group effects MA
Group		1	0.299	0.593
Error group		15
Within-group effects LA
Day (T0, T1, T2)		2	0.501	0.613	0.044
Day × group		2	3.099	0.065	0.220
Error day		22
Between-group effects LA
Group		1	0.604	0.454
Error group		11
Within-group effects EPA
Day (T0, T1, T2)		2	0.697	0.506	0.042
Day × group		2	0.303	0.733	0.019
Error day		32
Between-group effects EPA
Group		1	0.009	0.926
Error group		16

p < 0.05 is significant; GG, Greenhouse–Geisser correction, N = 10 per group.