Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;11:549527. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.549527

Table 5A.

Ability of the Helsinki Computed Tomography Score alone and a panel consisting of the Helsinki Computed Tomography and interleukin 10 in distinguishing patients with unfavorable outcome from patients with favorable outcome.

Markers (threshold to be classified as positive) % pAUC (95% CI) % Specificity (95% CI) % Sensitivity (95% CI)
HCTS HCTS (>1) 2.5 (1.2–4.6) 22.4 (12.2–34.7) 97.0 (90.9–100)
Panel HCTS (>4) + IL-10 (<0.48 pg/ml) 3.0 (1.3–6.0) 55.1 (40.8–69.4) 90.9 (78.8–100)

Marker thresholds to detect patients with unfavorable outcome are presented in the second column. At least one marker needs to exceed the threshold in order for the panel to be positive. In the figure, a value before the parenthesis indicates that at least one marker needs to be positive (exceed the threshold) in the panel. Values in the parenthesis are the specificity and sensitivity of the panel.

HCTS, Helsinki Computerized Tomography Score; IL-10, interleukin 10.