Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;11:604201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.604201

Table 3.

PRFs selected through the Delphi survey for each drug as the most important ones to foster safe prescribing of APs in older individuals.

Indicators Panel survey score (mean ± SD)
Clinical relevance Feasibility* Availability when asked
Haloperidol
Age 1.05 ± 0.7 1.25 ± 0.76 1.10 ± 0,39
Hepatic function 2.00 ± 0.9 1.73 ± 0.80 1.81 ± 0.72
Comorbidities 1.50 ± 0.6 1.48 ± 0.59 1.73 ± 0.54
EKG 1.60 ± 0.6 1.94 ± 0.77 2.16 ± 0.76
Electrolyte disturbances 1.90 ± 0.9 1.20 ± 0.86 1.91 ± 0.74
Co-medications 1.30 ± 0.7 1.41 ± 0.81 1.78 ± 0.76
Labeled indication 1.50 ± 0.7 1.27 ± 0.54 1.67 ± 0.87
Frailty/risk of falls 1.60 ± 0.7 1.77 ± 0.76 1.91 ± 0.85
Previous ADRs 1.40 ± 0.5 1.92 ± 0.78 2.24 ± 1.06
Cognitive status 1.80 ± 0.8 1.66 ± 0.57 1.97 ± 0.78
Benefit-risk ratio assessment 1.30 ± 0.5 1.51 ± 0.64 1.92 ± 0.89
Presence of Parkinson Disease 2.00 ± 0.80 1.89 ± 0.77 1.75 ± 0.74
Olanzapine/risperidone
Age 1.03 ± 0.24 1.03 ± 0.24 1.06 ± 0.33
Renal function 1.78 ± 0.58 1.78 ± 0.58 1.63 ± 0.69
Hepatic function 1.90 ± 0.67 1.90 ± 0.97 1.67 ± 0.67
Comorbidities 1.40 ± 0.54 1.40 ± 0.54 1.63 ± 0.51
Co-medications 1.50 ± 0.79 1.50 ± 0.79 1.70 ± 0.51
Hyperglycaemia/diabetes mellitus 1.76 ± 0.55 1.76 ± 0.55 1.59 ± 0.54
Weight 2.16 ± 0.95 2.16 ± 0.95 1.80 ± 0.65
Cardiovascular risk 2.03 ± 0.68 2.03 ± 0.68 1.97 ± 0.72
Labeled indication 1.56 ± 0.87 1.56 ± 0.87 1.58 ± 0.76
Frailty/Risk of falls 1.82 ± 0.91 1.82 ± 0.91 1.84 ± 0.82
Previous ADRs 1.94 ± 0.94 1.94 ± 0.94 2.06 ± 0.77
Cognitive status 1.71 ± 0.80 1.71 ± 0.80 1.63 ± 0.66
Benefit-risk ratio assessment 1.64 ± 0.77 1.64 ± 0.77 1.68 ± 0.77
Cerebrovascular risk 1.93 ± 0.48 1.93 ± 0.88 1.87 ± 0.89
Quetiapine
Age 1.60 ± 0.80 1.15 ± 0.35 1.06 ± 0.33
Hepatic function 1.90 ± 0.80 1.69 ± 0.68 1.64 ± 0.61
Comorbidities 1.50 ± 0.60 1.41 ± 0.63 1.49 ± 0.50
EKG 2.00 ± 0.70 2.10 ± 0.74 1.77 ± 0.62
Co-medication 1.40 ± 0.50 1.44 ± 0.70 1.64 ± 0.51
Cardiovascular risk 1.90 ± 0.70 2.20 ± 1.00 1.94 ± 0.68
Blood pressure 2.00 ± 0.80 1.46 ± 0.60 1.25 ± 0.61
Labeled indication 1.50 ± 0.60 1.49 ± 0.61 1.59 ± 0.81
Frailty/risk of falls 1.60 ± 0.70 1.79 ± 0.75 1.71 ± 0.74
Previous ADRs 1.60 ± 0.80 1.82 ± 0.72 1.92 ± 0.81
Cognitive status 1.70 ± 0.80 1.65 ± 0.61 1.68 ± 0.74
Benefit-risk ratio assessment 1.50 ± 0.70 1.59 ± 0.63 1.67 ± 0.81
Cerebrovascular risk 1.80 ± 0.80 1.89 ± 0.82 1.93 ± 0.92
Aripiprazole
Age 1.60 ± 0.80 1.12 ± 0.31 1.03 ± 0.24
Comorbidities 1.60 ± 0.80 1.49 ± 0.55 1.66 ± 0.57
Co-medications 1.60 ± 0.70 1.69 ± 0.95 1.69 ± 0.95
Cardiovascular risk 2.00 ± 0.80 2.20 ± 1.00 1.99 ± 0.79
Labeled indication 1.60 ± 0.70 1.77 ± 1.03 1.77 ± 0.98
Benefit-risk ratio assessment 1.50 ± 0.70 1.71 ± 1.01 1.96 ± 0.98
Cerebrovascular risk 1.90 ± 0.70 2.01 ± 0.99 1.82 ± 0.93
Clinical response and tolerability to previous APs 1.60 ± 0.70 2.04 ± 0.99 2.16 ± 0.91

ADRs, Adverse Drug Reactions; Aps, Antipsychotics; EKG, Electrocardiogram.

Rating scale: 1-Very important; 2-Important; 3-Equivocal; 4-Less important; 5-Not important.

*

Feasibility in clinical practice means how often do healthcare professionals, namely prescribers, have access to the selected indicators in their daily practice; rating scale: 1-Always; 2-Frequently; 3-Sometimes; 4-Rarely; 5-Never.

Rating scale: 1-Very easy; 2-Partially easy; 3-Equivocal; 4-Partially difficult; 5-Difficult.