Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;10(3):106–114. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202009_10(3).0002

Table 5. Results of risk analysis for clinically significant C1 & 2 IFs in CT scans for trauma evaluation.

aThe data present number (%).

C: category; CI: confidence interval; CT: computed tomography; DAMA: discharge against the medical advice; IFs: incidental findings; aOR: adjusted odds ratio.

 

Scans without IFs (N = 3,443)

Scans with C1 & 2 IFs (N = 319)

p value

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Sex

 

 

0.597

 

 

 

 

Female

1,546 (44.9)a

138 (43.3)

 

1.000

Reference

1.000

Reference

Male

1,897 (55.1)

181 (56.7)

 

1.069

0.848–1.347

1.274

0.993–1.635

Age

52.01 ± 23.77

65.81 ± 19.36

< 0.001

1.029

1.023–1.035

1.035

1.028–1.041

Disposition

 

 

< 0.001

 

 

 

 

Discharge

1,861 (54.1)

235 (73.7)

 

1.000

Reference

1.000

Reference

Hospitalization

1,402 (40.8)

65 (20.4)

 

0.367

0.277–0.487

0.268

0.198–0.364

DAMA

103 (3.0)

13 (4.1)

 

1.000

0.553–1.808

0.606

0.319–1.150

Transfer

67 (1.9)

6 (1.9)

 

0.709

0.304–1.653

0.605

0.251–1.459

Expire

4 (0.1)

0 (0.0)

 

0

0

0

0

Location of scans

 

 

< 0.001

 

 

 

 

Head

2,131 (61.9)

134 (42.0)

 

1.000

Reference

1.000

Reference

Neck

331 (9.6)

27 (8.5)

 

1.297

0.844–1.993

2.109

1.344–3.308

Chest

376 (10.9)

72 (22.6)

 

3.045

2.241–4.138

4.418

3.182–6.132

Abdomen

343 (10.0)

82 (25.7)

 

3.802

2.824–5.119

6.930

4.972–9.659

Extremities

262 (7.6)

4 (1.3)

 

0.243

0.089–0.662

0.433

0.157–1.195