Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;20(21):6285. doi: 10.3390/s20216285

Table 2.

The results of 48 linear mixed effect models (24 for Dataset 1 and 24 for Dataset 2), where the response variable was the phase of the signal. The effects of choices in artifact removal, EEG transformation, and filter are outlined in the table. The effects are shown separately for each frequency bands. Significant p-values are marked with asterisks (*).

Category Factor Model Number Band Dataset 1 Dataset 2
p F p F
Peaks Artifact removal 1 Theta 0.8540 0.03 0.9835 0
2 Mu 0.9414 0.01 0.8791 0.02
3 Beta 0.7915 0.07 0.9774 0
4 Gamma 0.7467 0.1 0.8507 0.04
EEG transformation 5 Theta 0.0016 * 6.43 0.7114 0.34
6 Mu 0.4775 0.74 0.7152 0.34
7 Beta 0.4565 0.78 0.8154 0.2
8 Gamma 0.5925 0.52 <0.0001 * 37.2
Filter 9 Theta <0.0001 * 64.94 <0.0001 * 199.87
10 Mu <0.0001 * 28.92 <0.0001 * 124.03
11 Beta <0.0001 * 19.76 <0.0001 * 91.64
12 Gamma 0.0534 3.74 <0.0001 * 248.94
Troughs Artifact removal 13 Theta 0.4906 0.48 0.4763 0.51
14 Mu 0.918 0.01 0.8828 0.02
15 Beta 0.9619 0 0.9739 0
16 Gamma 0.3493 0.88 0.8176 0.05
EEG transformation 17 Theta <0.0001 * 16.09 0.3556 1.03
18 Mu 0.3422 1.07 0.7311 0.31
19 Beta 0.8887 0.12 0.119 2.13
20 Gamma 0.0096 * 4.65 <0.0001 * 137.21
Filter 21 Theta 0.0785 3.1 <0.0001 * 162.35
22 Mu 0.0095 * 6.74 <0.0001 * 129.54
23 Beta <0.0001 * 15.2 <0.0001 * 94.82
24 Gamma 0.1117 2.53 <0.0001 * 161.87