TABLE 3.

ANOVA of reversal potential shift data

Tukey’s HSD for multiple comparisons. Analysis of variance indicates a significant effect due to condition, P = 0.0078. Group comparisons that were found to be significantly different were 30 µM ACh vs. 30 µM ACh + 10 µM GAT107, 10 µM GAT107 vs. 30 µM ACh + 10 µM GAT107, and 30 µM ACh + 10 µM PNU-120596.

Group 1	Group 2	CI, lower	Difference between groups	CI, upper	Adjusted P value
ACh alone	B-973B + ACh	−4.911	7.746	20.404	0.497
ACh alone	GAT alone	−10.048	2.610	15.267	0.995
ACh alone	GAT + ACh	3.794	16.452aa	29.109	0.004
ACh alone	PNU	−10.694	2.408	15.510	0.997
ACh alone	TQS	−2.366	10.736	23.838	0.173
ACh alone	B-973B alone	−8.042	6.390	20.822	0.816
B-973B + ACh	GAT alone	−17.794	−5.136	7.521	0.869
B-973B + ACh	GAT + ACh	−3.952	8.706	21.363	0.357
B-973B + ACh	PNU	−18.440	−5.338	7.764	0.867
B-973B + ACh	TQS	−10.112	2.990	16.092	0.992
B-973B + ACh	B-973B alone	−15.788	−1.356	13.076	1.000
GAT alone	GAT + ACh	1.184	13.842aa	26.499	0.024
GAT alone	PNU	−13.304	−0.202	12.900	1.000
GAT alone	TQS	−4.975	8.126	21.228	0.481
GAT alone	B-973B alone	−10.652	3.780	18.212	0.983

CI, confidence interval

^aSignificantly different.