Table 6.

Provider survey responses (n = 6).

Provider Survey Responses (n = 6)	0	1	2	3	4	Median	IQR
Are all the exercises provided in the interACTION system relevant and useful for rehabilitation? (4 - most relevant)	0	0	1	2	3	3.5	1
Does the screen layout and the calendar view make the clinician portal easy to navigate? (4 - easiest)	0	0	0	1	5	4	0
Is it easy and convenient to modify and assign exercises to the patient? (4 - very easy)	0	0	1	2	2	3	1
Is the visual feedback on the patient’s progress easy to understand? (4 - very easy to understand)	0	0	0	1	4	4	0
Are the forms of media (Patient Summary, Calendar View, Graphs, etc.) used to review data on patient performance and compliance useful? (4 - very useful)	0	0	0	1	4	4	0
Is the “Recovery Score” useful or helpful to keep track of patient recovery? (4 - very helpful)	0	0	0	3	2	3	1
Is the “Range of Motion Tracking” graph useful or helpful to keep track of patient recovery? (4 - very helpful)	0	0	1	1	3	4	1
Is the “Pain Levels Trends” graph useful or helpful to keep track of patient recovery? (4 - very helpful)	0	0	0	3	2	3	1
Is the “Compliance Score” useful or helpful to keep track of patient recovery? (4 - very useful)	0	0	0	0	5	4	0
Is the printout summary of patient progress useful or helpful by giving a concise and comprehensive view of the patient’s progress? (4 - very helpful)	0	0	0	0	2	4	0
						Yes	No
Would you consider using the interACTION device to manage rehabilitation again in the future?						6	0