Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 2;17(21):8060. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218060

Table 1.

Description of patients who attended the study, including recessions depth (in mm) before and after the surgery. Recession type following Cairo et al. [17].

Recession Depth
Patient Number Gender Age Tooth Number Bonded Lingual Retainer Removal Recession Type First Examination (mm) After Surgery Improvement (%)
(mm)
1 Male 37 32 no 1 6 1 83.33
2 Male 30 41 no 2 3 0.5 83.33
3 Male 27 41 no 1 5 3 40
4 Female 30 31 no 1 4 2.5 37.5
5 Female 25 31 no 2 4 3 25
6 Female 42 31 no 2 4 3 25
7 Male 28 31 no 1 4 2 50
8 Female 25 31 no 1 4 3 25
9 Female 28 31 no 1 4 3 25
10 Female 32 41 yes 1 4 0 100
11 Female 56 41 yes 2 6 1.5 75
12 Female 30 41 yes 2 4 1 75
13 Male 31 41 yes 2 5 0.5 90
14 Male 43 31 yes 2 6 1 83.33
15 Male 24 32 yes 1 3 0 100