Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 5;10(21):12385–12394. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6869

Table 3.

Output from logistic regression predicting the probability of infection with Crepidostomum spp.

Predictors Crepidostomum sp. prevalence
Odds ratios CI p
(Intercept) 0.00 0.00–0.00 <.001
G. lacustris length 1.31 1.15–1.51 <.001
Site [L2] 0.92 0.25–3.39 .901
Site [L4] 32.29 11.58–106.89 <.001
Site [L5] 0.55 0.12–2.16 .397
Collec. period [Aug 2015] 5.94 1.50–26.18 .014
Collec. period [Oct 2012] 19.48 5.98–71.07 <.001
Collec. period [Sep 2013] 5.25 2.10–14.48 .001
Observations 441

Null deviance: 364.47, df = 449. Residual deviance: 231.78, df = 441. McFadden pseudo R 2 = 0.37. Reference site and year = L1, August 2012. Site L3 and the June 2013 sampling period were removed due to too few observations.

p‐values are listed in bold for significant relationships.