TABLE 3.
Best subsets from candidate models
| Response variable | Model | Explanatory variable | Adjusted R 2 | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall roadkill | 1 | Road type | 20.40 | 205.81 |
| 2 | Model 1 + Distance from continuous forest | 25.45 | 194.57 | |
| 3* | Model 2 + Year | 28.14 | 194.17 | |
| 4 | Model 3 + Distance from fragmented forest | 28.77 | 194.19 | |
| 5 | Model 4 + Altitude | 28.94 | 195.38 | |
| 6 | Model 5 + Survey effort | 28.86 | 197.19 | |
| Large‐sized mammal roadkill | 1 | Year | 2.07 | 342.91 |
| 2 | Model 1 + Road type | 3.50 | 339.33 | |
| 3* | Model 2 + Distance from fragmented forest | 4.56 | 336.99 | |
| 4 | Model 3 + Distance from continuous forest | 4.66 | 337.96 | |
| 5 | Model 4 + Altitude | 4.98 | 338.16 | |
| 6 | Model 5 + Survey effort | 4.92 | 339.65 | |
| Medium‐sized mammal roadkill | 1 | Road type | 12.09 | 354.46 |
| 2 | Model 1 + Distance from continuous forest | 15.42 | 342.47 | |
| 3 | Model 2 + Year | 19.04 | 333.21 | |
| 4* | Model 3 + Distance from fragmented forest | 20.51 | 328.72 | |
| 5 | Model 4 + Altitude | 20.76 | 329.05 | |
| 6 | Model 5 + Survey effort | 20.63 | 330.85 |
The most parsimonious model for each response variable (labeled with *) is determined based on a lowest AIC and complemented with an adjusted R 2.