Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;17(21):8199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218199

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of the prevalence of macroprolactinemia among patients with hyperprolactinemia.

Study Characteristic Number of Studies Random Effect Pooled Prevalence 95% CI of Pooled Prevalence Within Group Heterogeneity Between Group Heterogeneity
I2 (%) χ2 (df) p-Value χ2 (df) p-Value
Region
European Region 37 17.5 14.0, 21.2 95.7 840.70 (36) <0.001 7.32 (3) 0.062
Region of the Americas 14 29.1 18.5, 41.0 97.1 455.07 (13) <0.001
Western Pacific Region 7 12.6 6.7, 19.9 89.3 55.94 (6) <0.001
South-East Asian Region 3 12.7 4.7, 23.1 - - -
African Region 2 30.3 25.0, 36.0 - - -
Eastern Mediterranean Region 4 13.9 4.8, 26.3 83.8 18.53 (3) <0.001
Sex
Both (male and female) 52 17.1 13.8, 20.6 96.2 1359.49 (51) <0.001 6.56 (1) 0.010
Female only 14 25.4 19.6, 31.6 84.9 86.49 (13) <0.001
Male only 1 41.2 24.6, 59.3 - - -
Age group
Adults only 48 19.8 16.6, 23.2 93.3 697.08 (47) <0.001 0.23 (1) 0.630
Teenagers and adults 10 18.0 11.9, 25.0 92.2 114.91 (9) <0.001
Teenagers only 1 21.9 9.3, 40.0 - - -
Year period
Before 2000 4 26.5 11.2, 45.2 95.4 64.56 (3) <0.001 2.64 (2) 0.267
Between 2000 and 2009 30 20.4 16.5, 24.5 94.6 536.29 (29) <0.001
Between 2010 and 2019 33 16.4 12.4, 20.9 94.3 557.34 (32) <0.001
PEG type
PEG 6000 47 18.8 15.0, 23.0 95.6 1053.67 (46) <0.001 0.06 (1) 0.801
PEG 8000 6 16.7 7.8, 27.7 90.6 53.43 (6) <0.001

PEG: Polyethylene glycol.