Table 2.
Study (year) | Selection bias | Performance bias | Detection bias | Attrition bias | Reporting bias | Other bias |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
An et al. (2018) | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Zhang et al. (2017) | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
An et al. (2017) | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Zhou et al. (2016) | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Liu et al. (2016) | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
He et al. (2016) | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Guo et al. (2015) | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Liu et al. (2018) | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Shu et al. (2014) | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Hu et al. (2013) | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Tao et al. (2016) | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Huang et al. (2015) | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Yan et al. (2016) | Unclear | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear |
Results of the articles were divided into low risk, unclear risk, and high risk.