Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2020 Oct 24;79:101681. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101681

Table 3.

Association of blood metal concentrations with ASD status among children with different GSTP1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genotypes based on interactive (metal *GST gene) models using CLR (Conditional Logistic Regression) models.

Metal Genetic genotype Genetic Model Genotype (s) Dichotomized/Quartiles Matched OR (95% CI) P-Value P-Value for Interaction
Mn GSTP1 Co-dominant Ile/Ile ≥75th vs. <75th 1.81 (0.88, 3.70) 0.11 0.09
Ile/Val ≥75th vs. <75th 0.84 (0.48, 1.48) 0.55
Val/Val ≥75th vs. <75th 0.57 (0.22, 1.44) 0.23
Dominant Val/* ≥75th vs. <75th 0.77 (0.47, 1.25) 0.29 0.03
Ile/Ile ≥75th vs. <75th 1.87 (0.92, 3.38) 0.09
Pb GSTP1 Co-dominant Ile/Ile 2 vs 1 0.49 (0.15, 1.51) 0.22 0.75
3 vs1 0.25 (0.08, 0.76) <0.01
4 vs 1 0.25 (0.08, 0.79) <0.01
Ile/Val 2 vs 1 0.62 (0.32, 1.21) 0.16
3 vs1 0.50 (0.25, 0.99) 0.05
4 vs 1 0.58 (0.30, 1.14) 0.11
Val/Val 2 vs 1 0.57 (0.21, 1.61) 0.29
3 vs1 0.21 (0.07, 0.67) <0.01
4 vs 1 0.42 (0.14, 1.27) 0.12
Dominant Val/* 2 vs 1 0.62 (0.35, 1.09) 0.10 0.63
3 vs1 0.40 (0.22, 0.71) <0.01
4 vs 1 0.53 (0.30, 0.95) <0.01
Ile/Ile 2 vs 1 0.48 (0.16, 1.50) 0.21
3 vs1 0.25 (0.09, 0.76) <0.01
4 vs 1 0.25 (0.08, 0.77) <0.01
Hg GSTP1 Co-dominant Ile/Ile ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.69 (0.27, 1.81) 0.45 0.12
Ile/Val ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.21 (0.10, 0.45) <0.01
Val/Val ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.58 (0.21, 1.59) 0.29
Dominant Val/* ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.67 (0.27, 1.73) 0.40 0.15
Ile/Ile ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.30 (0.17, 0.53) <0.01
Al GSTP1 Co-dominant Ile/Ile ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.54 (0.24, 1.20) 0.13 0.17
Ile/Val ≥LoD vs. <LoD 1.13 (0.64, 1.98) 0.68
Val/Val ≥LoD vs. <LoD 1.53 (0.66, 3.54) 0.32
Dominant Val/* ≥LoD vs. <LoD 1.25 (0.77, 2.01) 0.37 0.08
Ile/Ile ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.57 (0.26, 1.26) 0.16
Pb GSTM1 DD 2 vs 1 0.68 (0.27, 1.70) 0.41 0.49
3 vs1 0.30 (0.11, 0.84) 0.02
4 vs 1 0.29 (0.11, 0.75) <0.01
I* 2 vs 1 0.47 (0.26, 0.88) <0.01
3 vs1 0.38 (0.21, 0.70) <0.01
4 vs 1 0.50 (0.27, 0.95) 0.03
Hg GSTM1 DD ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.51 (0.34, 1.72) 0.18 0.40
I* ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.30 (0.17, 0.56) <0.01
Mn GSTM1 DD ≥75th vs. <75th 0.94 (0.42, 2.09) 0.88 0.68
I* ≥75th vs. <75th 1.13 (0.71, 1.81) 0.60
Pb GSTT1 DD 2 vs 1 0.62 (0.23, 1.66) 0.34 0.82
3 vs1 0.27 (0.09, 0.80) <0.01
4 vs 1 0.46 (0.18, 1.21) 0.12
I* 2 vs 1 0.51 (0.28, 0.93) 0.03
3 vs1 0.41 (0.22, 0.73) <0.01
4 vs 1 0.42 (0.22, 0.78) <0.01
Al GSTT1 DD ≥LoD vs. <LoD 2.00 (0.90, 4.47) 0.09 0.04
I* ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.77 (0.48, 1.25) 0.29
Hg GSTT1 DD ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.29 (0.11, 0.76) <0.01 0.58
I* ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.39 (0.22, 0.70) <0.01
As GSTT1 DD ≥LoD vs. <LoD 1.18 (0.54, 2.57) 0.67 0.07
I* ≥LoD vs. <LoD 0.56 (0.33, 0.96) 0.03
Mn GSTT1 DD ≥75th vs. <75th 1.67 (0.77, 3.59) 0.19 0.13
I* ≥75th vs. <75th 0.84 (0.51, 1.37) 0.48

For GSTP1, n = 524 children (262 matched pairs); For GSTM1, n = 518 children (259 matched pairs); For GSTT1, n= 516 children (258 matched pairs).

Mn was categorized into binary (≥75th vs. <75th), Pb was categorized into quartiles, and Hg, As, Al, and Cd were categorized into binary (≥limit of detection (LoD) vs. <LoD).