Table 12.

Classification and recognition comparisons.

Paper	Device	Pods Sensors	Gestures		Train/Test Users	Class.(%)	Recog.(%)	HGR Model	Recognition Evaluated	Rotation Performed	Correction of Rotation
[39]	MYO	8 *	5	$G{r}_1$	12/12	97.80	-	S	no	no	no
[70]	Delsys	12	6	$G{r}_3$	40/40	79.68	-	S	no	no	no
[39]	MYO	8 *	5	$G{r}_1$	12/12	98.70	-	S	no	no	no
[55]	Sensors	5	11	$G{r}_4$	4/4	81.00	-	S	no	yes	no
[57]	High Density	96	11	$G{r}_5$	1/1	60.00	-	S	no	yes	no
[58]	MYO	8 *	15	$G{r}_6$	1/1	91.47	-	S	no	yes	yes
[59]	MYO	8 *	6	$G{r}_1$	10/10	94.70	-	S	no	yes	yes
[63]	MYO	8 *	5	$G{r}_2$	40/40	92.40	-	G	no	yes	yes
S-HGR **	MYO	8 *	5	$G{r}_1$	306/306	94.96	94.20	S	yes	yes	yes
G-HGR **	MYO	8 *	5	$G{r}_1$	306/306 ***	81.22	80.31	G	yes	yes	yes
S-HGR **	MYO	8*	5	$G{r}_1$	306/306	94.96	94.20	S	yes	yes	yes

${}^{\ast }$ Myo bracelet used, ${}^{\ast \ast }$ Specific and General Proposed Models, user-specific (S), and user-general (G) HGR models. ${}^{\ast \ast \ast }$ Training users are different from testing users; a description of the gestures $G{r}_1$ to $G{r}_7$ that the analyzed papers study can be found in the Appendix D.