Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;10:19653. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76759-y

Table 4.

Correlation rates of the GWAS-top 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 3% marker-sets and whole marker-set.

Data Phenotype Selected markersa RRB (train/val./test) RF (train/val./test) DNN (train/val./test) CNN (train/val./test)
Rice DTF 184 0.838/0.777/0.343 0.935/0.641/0.330 0.914/0.727/0.328 0.862/0.686/0.301
369 0.890/0.709/0.480 0.963/0.570/0.464 0.945/0.717/0.412 0.905/0.656/0.410
738 0.919/0.715/0.478 0.968/0.621/0.484 0.962/0.726/0.406 0.925/0.734/0.468
1107 0.940/0.715/0.448 0.968/0.644/0.485 0.966/0.713/0.486 0.931/0.659/0.439
All 0.844/0.412/0.515 0.964/0.398/0.529 0.899/0.366/0.512 0.923/0.363/0.504
PC 184 0.816/0.744/0.366 0.947/0.500/0.376 0.851/0.664/0.304 0.834/0.680/0.308
369 0.871/0.717/0.517 0.960/0.524/0.471 0.844/0.624/0.486 0.872/0.555/0.387
738 0.917/0.761/0.508 0.963/0.513/0.521 0.874/0.619/0.532 0.891/0.708/0.402
1107 0.944/0.760/0.545 0.968/0.495/0.537 0.958/0.776/0.531 0.912/0.732/0.422
All 0.874/0.449/0.473 0.968/0.326/0.542 0.902/0.554/0.521 0.917/0.415/0.400
PH 184 0.914/0.834/0.494 0.971/0.787/0.578 0.931/0.795/0.492 0.944/0.814/0.586
369 0.946/0.859/0.571 0.976/0.808/0.617 0.934/0.823/0.579 0.950/0.772/0.643
738 0.970/0.869/0.566 0.980/0.830/0.646 0.956/0.875/0.527 0.952/0.865/0.527
1107 0.982/0.897/0.636 0.979/0.849/0.661 0.964/0.890/0.603 0.955/0.879/0.669
All 0.985/0.733/0.631 0.972/0.737/0.548 0.912/0.765/0.624 0.972/0.737/0.548
SOY DTF 478 0.641/0.558/0.578 0.744/0.644/0.627 0.663/0.660/0.628 0.566/0.578/0.584
957 0.832/0.795/0.705 0.957/0.778/0.725 0.825/0.763/0.705 0.634/0.636/0.656
1914 0.905/0.840/0.757 0.974/0.775/0.764 0.897/0.825/0.747 0.846/0.804/0.739
2871 0.944/0.872/0.767 0.978/0.809/0.771 0.938/0.850/0.746 0.810/0.804/0.753
All 0.973/0.743/0.753 0.976/0.752/0.760 0.921/0.751/0.763 0.904/0.721/0.748

Highest correlation rates in each phenotype are shown in bold.

aRows of each phenotype represent the number of GWAS top 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 3%, and all markers in order.