Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;2(11):e0252. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000252

Table 2.

Characteristics of the Top 100 Influencers of the Critical Care Congress

Variable 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Overall metrics
 Total number of tweets at conference 1,629 4,293 13,846 14,169 19,821 25,678 29,657
 Total number of tweets by top 100 influencers 456 3,614 10,839 9,752 13,761 17,329 18,907
 Percent conference tweets by top 100 influencers 28 84 78 69 69 67 64
 Number of tweets of top influencers per conference, median (IQR) 4 (2–8) 9 (6–23) 33 (21–83) 39 (23–87) 50 (31–102) 66 (41–137) 81 (54–137)
Characteristics of users
 Percent individuals 77 80 87 79 85 81 82
 Percent individuals attended conference 29 (n = 22/77) 31 (n = 25/80) 45 (n = 39/87) 51 (n = 40/79) 60 (n = 51/85) 69 (n = 56/81) 68 (n = 56/82)
 Percent individuals male 46 (n = 46/74) 68 (n = 53/78) 64 (n = 54/85) 52 (n = 41/79) 56 (n = 47/84) 62 (n = 50/81) 54 (n = 45/82)
 Percent individuals nonhealth 12 12 1 0 1 2 7
 Percent healthcare providers 65 68 86 79 84 79 77
 Percent doctors 49 42 49 51 59 56 52
 Percent healthcare organizations 17 15 11 15 14 18 15
 Percent organization nonhealth 1 3 1 2 1 0 0
 Percent industry 5 2 1 4 0 1 0
Characteristics of tweets
 Percent retweets 72 (30–100%) 54 (29–98%) 55 (26–98%) 69 (37–90%) 62 (28–88%) 67 (39–90%)
 Percent retweets by individuals attending conference 38 (25–56%) 38 (21–58%) 40 (26–63%) 58 (24–75%) 41 (25–64%) 57 (34–74%)
 Percent retweets by individuals not attending conference 100 (60–100%) 94 (38–100%) 81 (32–100%) 80 (48–100%) 90 (64–100%) 92 (62–99%)
 Number of tweets of individuals attending conference, median (IQR) 7 (4–52) 10 (7–43) 45 (26–192) 42 (27–92) 57 (34–168) 59 (39–212) 92 (58–162)
 Number of tweets of individuals not attending conference, median (IQR) 3 (2–7) 8 (5–18) 25 (19–65) 38 (24–68) 47 (28–88) 75 (45–122) 66 (45–128)

Retweet data not available for 2014.