Table 2.
Comparison of classification performance on individual RBCs using Mask R-CNN, XGBoost with manual delineation and XGBoost with Mask R-CNN segmentation results.
| Method | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | -score | AUC | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mask R-CNN | 97.1 | 98.5 | 0.975 | 0.982 | 97.8 |
| XGBoost with MD | 99.9 | 100 | 0.992 | 0.999 | 99.9 |
| XGBoost with Mask R-CNNa | 99.9 | 100 | 0.992 | 0.999 | 99.9 |
Note: AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; MD, manual delineation.
XGBoost classifier trained with the segmentation results from Mask R-CNN.