. 2020 Oct 22;7(5):ENEURO.0331-20.2020. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0331-20.2020

Table 2.

Statistical table

Data	Method	Factor	n	T, U, or F stat	p value	Post hoc correction
Fig. 1C	Mann–Whitney	Resident vs control	6, 7	U = 2	0.008
Fig. 1D	Mann–Whitney	Resident vs control	6, 7	U = 5	0.027
Fig. 1E	Student’s t test	Resident vs control	6, 7	T₍₁₁₎ = 0.164	0.872
Fig. 1F	Student’s t test	Resident vs control	6, 7	T₍₁₁₎ = 0.062	0.952
Fig. 1H	One-way ANOVA	# of cells at bregma −4.84	5, 5	F_(2,14) = 13.339	<0.001	Tukey’s
	One-way ANOVA	# of cells at bregma −4.60	5, 5	F_(2,14) = 6.357	0.013	Tukey’s
	One-way ANOVA	# of cells at bregma −4.34	5, 5	F_(2,14) = 168.490	<0.001	Tukey’s
Fig. 1I	One-way ANOVA	% of DAPI at bregma −4.84	5, 5	F_(2,14) = 13.859	<0.001	Tukey’s
	One-way ANOVA	% of cells at bregma −4.60	5, 5	F_(2,14) = 4.493	0.035	Tukey’s
	One-way ANOVA	% of cells at bregma −4.34	5, 5	F_(2,14) = 20.455	<0.001	Tukey’s
Fig. 2C	Mann–Whitney	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	U = 0	0.005
Fig. 2D	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 0.203	0.843
Fig. 2G	One-way ANOVA	TpH2 vs ChR2	5, 5	F_(2,17) = 13.714	<0.001	Tukey’s
	One-way ANOVA	TpH2 vs ArchT	5, 5	F_(2,17) = 20.868	<0.001	Tukey’s
Fig. 2K	Student’s t test	Opsin vs GFP	5, 4	T₍₇₎ = 0.793	0.454
Fig. 2O	Student’s t test	Before light onset (10 s)	5, 4	T₍₇₎ = −0.607	0.563
	Student’s t test	During light (10 s)	5, 4	T₍₇₎ = 0.882	0.407
Fig. 2S	Student’s t test	Before light onset (10 s)	5, 3	T₍₆₎ = 0.136	0.896
	Student’s t test	During light (10 s)	5, 3	T₍₆₎ = −10.784	<0.001
Fig. 3L	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.68	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 0.325	0.752
	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.68	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 0.890	0.346
	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.34	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 0.396	0.701
Fig. 3M	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.34	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 8.033	<0.001
	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.10	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 3.850	0.003
	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP at bregma 2.10	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 7.965	<0.001
Fig. 4L	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 0.474	0.646
Fig. 4M	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 0.558	0.589
Fig. 4N	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 0.258	0.801
Fig. 4O	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 1.100	0.297
Fig. 4P	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 1.203	0.257
Fig. 4Q	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 4.693	<0.001
Fig. 4R	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 2.745	0.021
Fig. 4S	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 3.104	0.011
Fig. 4T	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 1.597	0.141
Fig. 4U	Student’s t test	ChR2 vs GFP	6, 6	T₍₁₀₎ = 2.525	0.030
Fig. 5D	Student’s t test	Opsin vs GFP	4, 3	T₍₅₎ = 1.101	0.321
Fig. 5H	Student’s t test	Before light onset (10 s)	4, 3	T₍₅₎ = 0.845	0.437
	Mann–Whitney	During light (10 s)	4, 3	U = 28	0.952
Fig. 5L	Student’s t test	Before light onset (10 s)	4, 3	T₍₅₎ = 0.632	0.555
	Student’s t test	During light (10 s)	4, 3	T₍₅₎ = −6.606	<0.001
Fig. 6D	Student’s t test	Opsin vs GFP	5, 4	T₍₇₎ = 0.137	0.895
Fig. 6H	Student’s t test	Before light onset (10 s)	4, 3	T₍₅₎ = 0.845	0.437
	Mann–Whitney	During light (10 s)	4, 3	T₍₅₎ = 0	1.000
Fig. 6L	Student’s t test	Before light onset (10 s)	6, 4	T₍₈₎ = −1.217	0.278
	Student’s t test	During light (10 s)	6, 4	T₍₈₎ = 0.743	0.491
Fig. 7D	Student’s t test	Opsin vs GFP	4, 3	T₍₅₎ = 1.130	0.310
Fig. 7H	Student’s t test	Before light onset (10 s)	4, 3	T₍₅₎ = 1.425	0.214
	Student’s t test	During light (10 s)	4, 3	T₍₅₎ = 8.871	<0.001
Fig. 7L	Student’s t test	Opsin vs GFP	6, 4	T₍₈₎ = 1.010	0.342
Fig. 7P	Student’s t test	Before light onset (10 s)	6, 4	T₍₈₎ = 0.229	0.826
	Student’s t test	During light (10 s)	6, 4	T₍₈₎ = −12.538	<0.001