Table 2.
Correlation of Chinese herbal medicine in RA treatment.
| Items (LHS⇒RHS) | Support | Confidence | Expected confidence | Lift | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae}⇒{Poria} | 83.68% | 91.72% | 87.67% | 1.05 | <0.01 |
| {Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae}⇒{Poria} | 83.05% | 91.03% | 87.67% | 1.04 | <0.01 |
| {Semen Coicis}⇒{Poria} | 81.25% | 91.03% | 87.67% | 1.04 | <0.01 |
| {Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae}⇒{Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae} | 83.05% | 87.71% | 83.68% | 1.05 | <0.01 |
| {Poria}⇒{Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae} | 87.67% | 87.55% | 83.68% | 1.05 | <0.01 |
| {Semen Coicis}⇒{Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae} | 81.25% | 87.55% | 83.68% | 1.05 | <0.01 |
| {Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae}⇒{Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae} | 83.68% | 87.04% | 83.05% | 1.05 | <0.01 |
| {Semen Coicis}⇒{Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae} | 81.25% | 86.79% | 83.05% | 1.05 | <0.01 |
| {Poria}⇒{Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae} | 87.67% | 86.23% | 83.05% | 1.04 | <0.01 |
| {Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae}⇒{Semen Coicis} | 83.68% | 85.00% | 81.25% | 1.05 | <0.01 |
| {Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae}⇒{Semen Coicis} | 83.05% | 84.91% | 81.25% | 1.05 | <0.01 |
| {Poria}⇒{Semen Coicis} | 87.67% | 84.36% | 81.25% | 1.04 | <0.01 |
| {Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae}⇒{Flos Carthami} | 83.05% | 84.22% | 77.14% | 1.09 | <0.01 |
| {Radix Salviae Miltiorrhizae}⇒{Semen Persicae} | 83.05% | 82.25% | 74.77% | 1.10 | <0.01 |
| {Semen Persicae}⇒{Herba Taraxaci Mongolici} | 81.25% | 82.14% | 73.94% | 1.11 | <0.01 |
| {Semen Coicis}⇒{Flos Carthami} | 81.25% | 81.36% | 77.14% | 1.06 | <0.01 |
| {Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae}⇒{Flos Carthami} | 83.68% | 81.20% | 77.14% | 1.05 | <0.01 |
Values are % degrees of relevancy.