Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;2020:2793804. doi: 10.1155/2020/2793804

Table 5.

Effects of diabetes (DM) and/or estrogen deficiency on the mechanical properties of cancellous (the proximal tibial metaphysis) and compact (the femoral diaphysis) bone in rats.

Parameter/group Nonovariectomized (NOVX) rats Ovariectomized (OVX) rats Two-way ANOVA
Control DM Control DM OVX DM OVXx DM
Tibia Young's modulus (MPa) 4063 ± 430 3269 ± 390 2713 ± 248∗∗ 3169 ± 182 p < 0.05 NS NS
Fracture point load (N) 89.5 ± 7.5 54.5 ± 5.0∗∗∗ 60.0 ± 2.8∗∗∗ 43.6 ± 2.2∗∗∗X p < 0.001 p < 0.001 NS
Displacement for fracture point load (mm) 1.068 ± 0.054 1.004 ± 0.088 1.208 ± 0.074 0.953 ± 0.087 NS p < 0.05 NS
Energy for fracture point load (mJ) 80.8 ± 5.7 49.9 ± 7.0∗∗∗ 63.9 ± 5.0 40.7 ± 3.9∗∗∗XX p < 0.05 p < 0.001 NS
Stress for fracture point load (MPa) 74.1 ± 7.8 47.3 ± 4.8∗∗∗ 47.4 ± 4.2∗∗∗ 35.6 ± 1.3∗∗∗ p < 0.001 p < 0.001 NS

Femur Young's modulus (MPa) 8929 ± 242 10886 ± 373∗∗∗ 8957 ± 418 9955 ± 333X NS p < 0.001 NS
Maximum load (N) 124.8 ± 4.3 125.8 ± 3.8 130.1 ± 3.7 119.3 ± 5.3 NS NS NS
Displacement for maximum load (mm) 0.502 ± 0.021 0.493 ± 0.019 0.516 ± 0.034 0.487 ± 0.016 NS NS NS
Energy for maximum load (mJ) 38.0 ± 2.8 38.2 ± 2.4 41.0 ± 3.7 35.7 ± 2.6 NS NS NS
Stress for maximum load (MPa) 168.9 ± 4.2 189.7 ± 4.9∗∗ 171.2 ± 4.3 174.6 ± 5.7a NS p < 0.05 NS
Fracture point load (N) 123.3 ± 4.4 124.8 ± 3.6 129.4 ± 3.8 118.3 ± 5.2 NS NS NS
Displacement for fracture point load (mm) 0.517 ± 0.021 0.505 ± 0.021 0.524 ± 0.034 0.501 ± 0.019 NS NS NS
Energy for fracture point load (mJ) 39.8 ± 2.9 39.8 ± 2.6 42.0 ± 3.8 37.5 ± 3.2 NS NS NS
Stress for fracture point load (MPa) 166.8 ± 4.6 188.1 ± 4.6∗∗ 170.3 ± 4.4 173.1 ± 5.7a NS p < 0.05 NS

Bilateral ovariectomy was performed 5 weeks before the end of the experiment. Diabetes was induced 3 days after the ovariectomy by a single administration of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg i.p.). Results are presented as means ± SEM (n = 9 − 10). Two-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's LSD test was used for evaluation of the significance of the results. p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001—significantly different from the NOVX control rats; Xp < 0.05, XXp < 0.01—significantly different from the OVX control rats; ap < 0.05—significantly different from the DM-NOVX rats.