Table 1.
Summary of CXR interpretation score by grade and formal training.
| Frequency | Overall participants' score (out of 10) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No clinical history | Clinical history | ||||
| Median | IQR | Median | IQR | ||
| Grade | |||||
| Resident | 10 | 4.0 | 3–5 | 7.5 | 5–9 |
| Medical officer | 18 | 4.0 | 3-4 | 7.0 | 6–8 |
| House officer | 33 | 4.0 | 3-4 | 7.0 | 6–8 |
| Medical student | 38 | 3.0 | 2–4 | 5.5 | 5–7 |
| Total | 99 | 4.0 | 3-4 | 7.0 | 5–8 |
| Kruskal–Wallis test | X 2 = 6.647, p=0.084 | X 2 = 12.448, p=0.006 | |||
| Formal training | |||||
| Yes | 62 | 3.0 | 3-4 | 7.0 | 5–8 |
| No | 37 | 4.0 | 3–5 | 6.0 | 6–8 |
| Total | 99 | 4.0 | 3-4 | 7.0 | 5–8 |
| Wilcoxon rank-sum test | Z = −1.322, p=0.186 | Z = −0.024, p=0.981 | |||
IQR, interquartile range.