a Venn diagram of miRNAs whose expression is associated with a good prognosis in ovarian cancer patients (MiROvaR signature33) showing the overlap (n = 3) between miRNA predicted to target the ETAR 3′UTR (n = 5, red circle) and miRNA predicted to target the ZEB1 3′UTR (n = 7, green circle). b Expression levels of ETAR and miR-200b or miR-200c in the indicated cell lines. The ratio of ETAR/β-actin, evaluated by WB and miR-200b/c expression, evaluated by qRT-PCR and normalized to U6, are shown as bar and line, respectively. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 3). c ETAR mRNA levels in HEY and SKOV3 cells transfected for 48 h with mimic-miRNA control (miR-Ctr), mimic-miR-200b (miR-200b) or mimic-miR-200c (miR-200c) evaluated by qRT-PCR and normalized to cyclophilin-A. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 3; *p < 0.001 vs. Ctr). d Lysates from HEY and SKOV3 cells transfected as in c are analyzed by WB for ETAR expression. β-actin is used as loading control. e Luciferase activity in HEY cells co-transfected for 48 h with miR-Ctr, miR-200b, or miR-200c together with the reporter plasmid containing the 3’UTR region of ETAR (ETAR 3′UTR) or its triple mutant (mut/ΔETAR 3′UTR). Values are the mean ± SD expressed as fold induction (n = 3; *p < 0.001 vs. Ctr). f WB for ETAR expression in the lysates from HEY cells 48 h transfected with miRNA control, miR-200b or miR-200c inhibitors (anti-miR-Ctr, anti-miR-200b, and anti-miR-200c). β-actin is used as loading control. g Cell viability of HEY cells, transfected as in c and f, or with siRNA control (si-Ctr), or si-ETAR, and treated or not with macitentan (MAC) for 48 h. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 4; *p < 0.001 vs the respective Ctr). h Lysates of HEY cells transfected as in c together with a plasmid control (Mock), a wt ETAR expression plasmid, or with an ETAR expression plasmid w/o the 3′UTR as indicated are analyzed by WB for ETAR expression. β-actin is used as loading control. i Cell vitality of HEY cells transfected as in h. Values are the mean ± SD expressed as fold induction (n = 4; *p < 0.001 vs. Mock; **p < 0.001 vs. wt ETAR).