Table 2.
Design and results of orthogonal design
Number | ER | SS | PG | AA | Inhibition ratio (%) | DPPH IC50 (mg/ml) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Escherichia coli | Salmonella paratyphoid | ||||||
1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 93 | 100 | 24 |
2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 80 | 25 |
3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | – | – | 15 |
4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 44 | – | 36 |
5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | – | – | 12 |
6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | – | – | 10 |
7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | – | – | 35 |
8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 87 | – | 31 |
9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 26 | – | 19 |
ER Evodia rutaecarpa, SS Schisandra sphenanthera, PG Punica granatum peel, AA Artemisia argyi. –, bacterial inhibition ratio (%) was lower than 0