Table 3.
Effects of two compound plant extracts on growth performances in healthy mice
| Dose (mg/kg bw) | Growth performances | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADG (g) | ADFI (g) | F/G | ||
| Control | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 3.85 | 11.66 | |
| F1 | 111 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 3.36 | 10.00 |
| 333 | 0.44 ± 0.08 | 3.33 | 9.85 | |
| 1000 | 0.47 ± 0.05* | 3.22 | 9.30 | |
| 3000 | 0.36 ± 0.30 | 3.93 | 11.89 | |
| F2 | 111 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 3.72 | 11.17 |
| 333 | 0.42 ± 0.16 | 3.34 | 9.91 | |
| 1000 | 0.43 ± 0.08 | 3.38 | 10.03 | |
| 3000 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | 3.77 | 11.44 | |
F1 the compound extract from the raw plant material ratio of Evodia rutaecarpa: Schisandra sphenanthera:Punica granatum:Artemisia argyi is 9:9:1:3; F2 the corresponding ratio of the four plants is 9:9:9:3
ADG average daily gain, ADFI average daily feed intake, F/G ratio of feed to gain
Significant difference was *p < 0.05