Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 20;13(4):978–990. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00433-y

Table 2.

Participants’ responses to questions regarding FA experience

Questions Yes
N (%)
No
N (%)
N = 664
  Have you analyzed data from an FA? 631 (95.0) 33 (5.0)
  Have you implemented treatment based on the results of an FA? 610 (91.9) 54 (8.1)
  Have you assisted with or observed an FA? 602 (90.7) 62 (9.3)
  Have you designed an FA? 543 (81.8) 121 (28.2)
  Have you supervised an FA? 461 (69.4) 203 (30.6)
  Were there times you were unsure whether it was appropriate to conduct an FA? 519 (78.2) 145 (21.8)
  If you were to conduct an FA, would you be concerned about the validity of the results? 534 (80.4) 130 (19.6)
  Have you heard of the term “risk assessment” in relation to conducting an FA? 550 (82.8) 114 (17.2)
  Do you believe there is a need for a risk assessment tool that determines the risk of conducting an FA and offers ways to reduce risk posed in an FA? 629 (94.7) 35 (5.3)
  Would a tool that helps evaluate when it would be safe to conduct an FA be useful for the field of applied behavior analysis? 639 (96.2) 25 (3.8)
  Would you be more likely to conduct an FA if a tool existed that helped offer safety precautions, validity recommendations, and other considerations? 546 (82.2) 118 (17.8)
N = 598
  Have you used a formalized (standard decision-making tool) risk assessment before conducting an FA? 35 (5.8) 563 (94.2)
  Do you believe some behavior analysts do not conduct an FA when it is actually the best option to guide treatment? 559 (93.5) 39 (6.5)v