Table 4.

Multivariable analysis

Model 1: Linear regression taking the bullying victimization score as the dependent variable
	Unstandardized Beta	Standardized Beta	p	95% CI
				Lower	Upper
Psychological abuse	0.165	0.258	< 0.001	0.125	0.206
Internet addiction	0.105	0.270	< 0.001	0.088	0.122
Child abuse physical	0.197	0.176	< 0.001	0.131	0.263
Child abuse neglect	0.083	0.117	< 0.001	0.052	0.113
Physical activity index	-0.052	-0.107	< 0.001	-0.073	-0.032
Liebowitz- fear	0.045	0.105	< 0.001	0.024	0.066
Model 2: Logistic regression taking being bullied vs. not being bullied as the dependent variable
		ORa	p	95% CI
				Lower	Upper
Parents status (separate vs. living togethera)		3.084	< 0.001	1.958	4.858
Mild internet addiction vs. normala use		4.719	< 0.001	3.304	6.738
Moderate internet addiction vs. normala use		3.840	< 0.001	2.633	5.600
Poor physical activity vs. sedentarya		0.200	< 0.001	0.131	0.307
Fair physical activity vs. sedentarya		0.940	0.858	0.479	1.847
Very good physical activity vs. sedentarya		0.043	< 0.001	0.013	0.142
Liebowitz- fear (high vs. lowa)		1.507	0.024	1.055	2.152
Liebowitz- avoidance (high vs. lowa)		0.496	< 0.001	0.344	0.715
Psychological abuse scale (high vs. lowa)		3.596	< 0.001	2.633	4.910
Child abuse neglect scale (high vs. lowa)		2.217	< 0.001	1.658	2.965
Child abuse physical scale (high vs. lowa)		4.554	< 0.001	3.310	6.264

For Model 1: Variables entered in the model: parents’ status, IAT score, Liebowitz fear score, Liebowitz avoidance score, psychological abuse scale, child abuse neglect scale, child abuse physical scale and child abuse sexual scale, depression and physical activity index.

Adjusted R² = 0.383.

For Model 2: Variable(s) entered on step 1: Parents status, smoking status, Internet addiction test, Liebowitz fear score, Liebowitz avoidance score, psychological abuse scale, child abuse neglect scale, child abuse physical scale, child abuse sexual scale, house crowding index and physical activity score.

Adjusted R² = 0.517.

^aReference group